Notices by FreeinTX (freeintx@poa.st)

FreeinTX (freeintx@poa.st)'s status on Sunday, 17-Nov-2024 07:51:37 JST FreeinTX
in reply to
- Berlusconi Anime Fever :sonnenrad:
@MechaSilvio He won't. Trump is on the hook to stop that war and Putin has demonstrated that he wants the war to stop. Seems like Putin has an opportunity to dictate favorable terms and finish this in a better position than he is now. Why not take it?

In conversation about 5 days ago from poa.st permalink
FreeinTX (freeintx@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 05-Nov-2024 04:31:37 JST FreeinTX
in reply to
- Christi Junior
- Ardainian Hebrew Israelite
@ArdainianRight @ChristiJunior I'm hoping for the Raskin Gambit.

youtu.be/SN5d1suOeT8?ld=OYnvt-zRs2MtIrSA

In conversation about 17 days ago from poa.st permalink
FreeinTX (freeintx@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 18-Jul-2024 23:54:55 JST FreeinTX
in reply to
- Sneeze
@cough What happens when this short comes due and $DJT is at near record high?

In conversation about 4 months ago from poa.st permalink
FreeinTX (freeintx@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 03-May-2024 05:25:41 JST FreeinTX
in reply to
@WilhelmIII @BattleDwarfGimli @KennyWhitePowers @Rose @bobbala @feralphilosophernc @jb @lovelymiss @Escoffier @Liquid_Boss @Spingebill @UnCL3 @dictatordave @graf They can't pack the court. That was fearmingering at best. The SCOTUS itself will not allow the 6-3 majority to be removed by faggots in Congress or at the Executive level.

And, if revolt is what they want, the courts could have stood by OSHA and set the jab mandate. It would have kicked off a revolution that day.

In conversation about 7 months ago from poa.st permalink
FreeinTX (freeintx@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 03-May-2024 05:25:39 JST FreeinTX
@WilhelmIII @BattleDwarfGimli @KennyWhitePowers @Rose @bobbala @feralphilosophernc @jb @lovelymiss @Escoffier @Liquid_Boss @Spingebill @UnCL3 @dictatordave @graf Article 3 section 1 gives the SCOTUS the judicial authority to be the final say in all matters of legal interpretation and constitutional compliance challenges.

Which is to say that if a challenge to a court packing was brought before them, they could intervene using Stari Decisis.

When you look, up until the Civil War, the number was simply based on the number of circuit courts there were in the US. It seems to get more political as time went on after that, but "court packing" was seen as a bad thing and a power grab, and the label was used to defeat Presidential efforts to change the balance of power in the courts.

But yes, it looks like if a President wants additional judges and Congress can bring a vote, bypass filibuster in the Senate, and pass legislation to do so, then it could be done. And, once done, the court could intervene if a challenge was brought against the law. I don't see the number of judges changing any time in our lives.

In conversation about 7 months ago from poa.st permalink
FreeinTX (freeintx@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 03-May-2024 05:24:18 JST FreeinTX
@dictatordave @bobbala @BattleDwarfGimli @KennyWhitePowers @Rose @WilhelmIII @feralphilosophernc @jb @lovelymiss @Escoffier @Liquid_Boss @Spingebill @UnCL3 @graf I think the SCOTUS is beginning to recognize that their role is to prevent the masses from revolt.

Had they so chose, they could have backed the jab mandate, for example, but 20% of this country would have gone straight into a resistance role. If 10% of that 20% had become violent, that would have been 6 million violent people.

It's the same with our guns. SCOTUS might allow some regulations, but they are well aware that the people have had it with faggots like Joe Biden. Notice that he got exactly nowhere with his promise to ban assault rifles and has lost several ATF lawsuits.

In conversation about 7 months ago from poa.st permalink
FreeinTX (freeintx@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 03-May-2024 05:24:16 JST FreeinTX
@WilhelmIII @BattleDwarfGimli @KennyWhitePowers @Rose @bobbala @feralphilosophernc @jb @lovelymiss @Escoffier @Liquid_Boss @Spingebill @UnCL3 @dictatordave @graf Section 1 gives congress the authority to create inferior courts

Section 2 gives the Senate the authority to advise and consent for appointees to the Supreme Court.

If you'd suggest that an interpretation of Section 2 by having the authority to advise and consent to appoint judges to the Supreme Court as the method to create new vacancies, I'd suggest that this is where the Supreme Court could disagree, and it is the Supreme Court under Article 3 Section 1 that has "The judicial Power of the United States, ..."

It doesn't say that Senate has the power to authorize new appointments, only to advise and consent to appoint those appointees to the SCOTUS. Ultimately, SCOTUS would have the final say, as they always do in matters of law and constitutional interpretation.

In conversation about 7 months ago from poa.st permalink
FreeinTX (freeintx@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 03-May-2024 05:23:04 JST FreeinTX
@Spingebill @bobbala @BattleDwarfGimli @KennyWhitePowers @Rose @WilhelmIII @feralphilosophernc @jb @lovelymiss @Escoffier @Liquid_Boss @UnCL3 @dictatordave @graf How did they define it?

When the assault weapons ban was passed in the US, the definition used was about attachments and barrel length. CA's definition just made the AR look retarded.

In conversation about 7 months ago from poa.st permalink
FreeinTX (freeintx@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 03-May-2024 05:23:00 JST FreeinTX
@WilhelmIII @BattleDwarfGimli @KennyWhitePowers @Rose @bobbala @feralphilosophernc @jb @lovelymiss @Escoffier @Liquid_Boss @Spingebill @UnCL3 @dictatordave @graf Can you show me where that is written in the Constitution? I don't recall that being a thing.

In conversation about 7 months ago from poa.st permalink
FreeinTX (freeintx@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 03-May-2024 05:22:13 JST FreeinTX
@bobbala @BattleDwarfGimli @KennyWhitePowers @Rose @WilhelmIII @feralphilosophernc @jb @lovelymiss @Escoffier @Liquid_Boss @Spingebill @UnCL3 @dictatordave @graf For now, I do not feel the battle has been lost. 26 states are now constitutional carry and the last 3 SCOTUS decisions were to reverse gun laws that were prohibitive, and using good language in the precedent. The Heller decision had some troubling statements (The right to own a gun is a privilege.) but it looks like things are tending towards more secure gun rights.

In conversation about 7 months ago from poa.st permalink
FreeinTX (freeintx@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 03-May-2024 05:22:07 JST FreeinTX
@WilhelmIII @BattleDwarfGimli @KennyWhitePowers @Rose @bobbala @feralphilosophernc @jb @lovelymiss @Escoffier @Liquid_Boss @Spingebill @UnCL3 @dictatordave @graf No, I'm quoting Article 3 Section 1 and Section 2 where it says,

>The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.

And

>The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;

And, while lawyers like to reinterpret Marbury v. Madison to suggest that the courts have the "final say", what MvM says is that the People have the final say in that they can challenge any law as being null and void and bring that challenge before the court to argue their case. Once determined by the courts to be unconstitutional, then that law (or at least that section of law) becomes null and void under MvM.

The challenge must be brought by the people, but once that challenge is brought, the court makes the decisions regarding legal interpretation and constitutional compliance.

In conversation about 7 months ago from poa.st permalink
FreeinTX (freeintx@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 21-Mar-2024 16:07:00 JST FreeinTX
- Wormwood
@Wormwood What explains the lack of traffic?

In conversation about 8 months ago from poa.st permalink
FreeinTX (freeintx@poa.st)'s status on Saturday, 16-Mar-2024 02:28:54 JST FreeinTX
in reply to
- 『VRISKA』
- meso
@vriska @meso It doesn't seem like rainbow logos are doing anything to increase revenues or profits, tho.

In the case of Bud Light, they lost over a billion dollars only to have Doritos follow suit. Go woke, get broke is clearly a thing, especially in certain market sectors, yet the DIE continues. Shareholders should sue.

In conversation about 8 months ago from poa.st permalink
FreeinTX (freeintx@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 20:42:31 JST FreeinTX
in reply to
- Moffintosh
- Disinformation Purveyor :verified_think:
@thatguyoverthere @moffintosh Exactly. Maybe out in the middle of nowhere some 16 year old high school kid is making min wage working at the local feed store or sum shit, but even Mickey D's pays $18-20/hr.

In conversation about a year ago from poa.st permalink
FreeinTX (freeintx@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 20:39:34 JST FreeinTX
- Moffintosh
@moffintosh Who makes min wage in Texas?

In conversation about a year ago from poa.st permalink
FreeinTX (freeintx@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 29-Jun-2023 07:33:57 JST FreeinTX
in reply to
- Woggy's Zeonic Frolicks
- PinochetsCommieCopter
@PinochetsCommieCopter @WashedOutGundamPilot I can't believe memeology posted it.

In conversation Thursday, 29-Jun-2023 07:33:57 JST from poa.st permalink
FreeinTX (freeintx@poa.st)'s status on Saturday, 13-May-2023 21:25:08 JST FreeinTX
@PonyPanda @ehhh @Terry @sjw @marine @BillingtonYVR @PhenomX6 @NecroKvntPuke @Waerloga @colonelj @mia @p @sysrq @billy_hughes @lunarised We all love Emma. But, I haven't seen her posts lately. Maybe I'm blocked or something.

In conversation Saturday, 13-May-2023 21:25:08 JST from poa.st permalink
FreeinTX (freeintx@poa.st)'s status on Sunday, 12-Mar-2023 01:07:22 JST FreeinTX
in reply to
@nugger @Jens_Rasmussen @Imp @MeBigbrain Yup.
In conversation Sunday, 12-Mar-2023 01:07:22 JST from poa.st permalink
Attachments
1. Untitled attachment
  https://i.poastcdn.org/5a4fbaa2d98101ee230cc2038851f89144b1795e6e58c48a2438ef0e2cd52f4e.jpg
FreeinTX (freeintx@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 24-Feb-2023 01:12:10 JST FreeinTX
in reply to
- Kenny Blankenship
- Rudolf_von_Goldenbaum
@DW2 @Rudolf_von_Goldenbaum This seems normal. Young women look for stable men. Men become stable as they get older.

In conversation Friday, 24-Feb-2023 01:12:10 JST from poa.st permalink
FreeinTX (freeintx@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Feb-2023 23:14:40 JST FreeinTX
in reply to
- Chet
@Chet >The team was on its way to respond to an incident at the I. Schumann & Co. metal alloy manufacturer in Ohio, CTEH said. An industrial blast at the plant killed a person and injured more than a dozen other people Monday.

nbcnews.com/news/us-news/little-rock-plane-crash-rcna71807

In conversation Thursday, 23-Feb-2023 23:14:40 JST from poa.st permalink

Before

Public

Notices by FreeinTX (freeintx@poa.st)

User actions

Following 0

Followers 0

Groups 0

Statistics

Feeds