Could be worse. From what I read in some places they were automatically putting anyone who tested positive on remsdecivir and killing them.
It sounds like chaos.
I also remember reading about all the overflow facilities they build in new york and never used. One doctor said they were there on something crazy like $300 a day doing nothing. Same with the US army hospital ship Trump send them. Never used.
My sister was *pissed* at me for refusing the vaxx. She's a doctor but she didn't even distinguish between them when trying to get me to take them. I gave her lots of openings to acknowledge there was more than one and they worked differently, but she never took it. That was the point where I confirmed it was just groupthink with no substance. She quit shortly afterwards, I think she has "long-covid."
> You have the arrow of causality ass-backwards. They are treated because they have an infection that is killing them.
They are "treated" because they tested positive on a test renowned for it's faulty results even though they presented at the hospital for something completely different, like a broken leg.
> No they aren't again you are full of shit.
Lmao. I know literally no one who died of the coof. Not one. Everyone I know got it eventually, 0 deaths. Even the elderly ones.
Now all of a sudden otherwise healthy 40 and 50 year olds are getting heart attacks and strokes. Only the ones who vaxxed though.
> not that false positives never happen but how many tests did that take? more likely, of course, is you were actually positive
Three. If I was actually positive then that still means the killer virus was so dangerous it was unnoticeable and I tested negative twice. A massive L for both the test and the virus.
> That does sound broken. Link?
No link, it was on a facebook group. I deleted my facebook account a while ago.
> That is not a valid test
So it should come back negative. If the test produces spurious positive results from bad sampling then it's a broken test.
> which is still low enough you could probably have nobody in your life
Exactly. On a global scale that's a very low number. Especially considering that all the flu season deaths were being counted as covid deaths.
> The result of letting covid run rampant in australia was where the carnage happened.
Funny how the countries with the strictest lockdowns and harshest treatments had so much carnage...
> No it doesn't. It causes *more* heart damage to antivaxxers.
So why aren't we dying? I've seen articles claiming we are but I haven't seen it actually happen to anyone I know.
> You have obviously not read any of the studies on this topic.
"The studies" are no more reliable than the TV. Academia has been lying out it's ass to uphold globalist narratives for a long time. I have no reason to expect them to become honest now. Meanwhile cold hard reality in front of my eyes says that covidiots are dying and anyone who avoided the jab is doing fine.
Uh huh... and meanwhile asymptomatic patients are suddenly taking a downturn and dying the moment they get "treated".
Meanwhile if you get the coof and don't seek treatment at all (just stay him with vits and wrap up warm) your chances of survival are pretty much guaranteed.
The tests are random. I scored a week off work by taking it a few times until I got the right result.
One woman working in a trucking company was pissed off with the chaotic results so she sent in 10 tests all of her own samples, 5 pos, 5 neg. Another woman got different results for her left and right nostril. A guy testing the UN's testing protocol found a papaya fruit that tested positive and a lab in the UK got caught reporting every single sample as negative.
> you're making shit up now
You say that for everything. That particular story happened in australia, but the same issue was widespread. Wherever hospitals could score extra money by creating a casedemic and using it as an excuse to dole out "run-death-is-near" they did. The result was carnage.
> Consider yourself lucky.
Luck has nothing to do with it. It's statistical likelyhood. Very few people globally died from the coof. And that's when they were counting everyone who died with flu symptoms as a "covid death."
> This part is true BECAUSE COVID CAUSES HEART DAMAGE
Funny how it's only causing heart damage to vaxxers. Probably a coincidence.
> This isn't true. It's the other way around: the unvaxxed are the ones who are getting strokes more than the vaxxed.
I know of literally no cases of anti-vaxxers getting strokes or heart attacks. None.
Covidiots on the other hand are dropping like flies.
Reminds me of the stealth fighter that got shot down in the balkans conflict. Bunch of gyppos scrapped half of it before someone showed up to preserve it. The remains ended up in a museum.
I will never understand why normies still put their kids through this. It makes no economic, moral or political sense unless you're a complete masochist.
Weird... I knew it was a historical thing but I had no idea it was modern too. They seem to have an almost complete separation between marriage and romance.
You say that but several countries already have laws against loli, and they are quite strictly enforced. Men go to jail over it.
I'm not a loli fan, but I know full well where it's heading. They'll create some new agency to regulate AI and it'll just happen to be primarily staffed by jews and spend most of their time "combatting hate speech."
Then in a few years time they'll apologise for their pedophobia and drop the anti loli regs. The agency will stay though.
I never said there shouldn't be laws against CP or child trafficking though, I said the feds shouldn't be involved because they'll only use that power to rape kids and attack White communities.
Any attempt by feds to create new laws and agencies should be first and foremost interpreted with an assumption that they will be primarily misused for other purposes. Children and terrorism are only ever an excuse.
> sorry but to me it still sounds like they are mainly focused on the issue of AI generating stuff that looks like CSAM of children, *not* lolis. the line about being able to generate children whether or not they actually exist isn't in reference to whether or not they are drawn, but whether the child physically exists in the real world and is being deepfaked or the generated child doesn't exist and but is being pulled from a bunch of reference images of children that do exist.
That's all well and good, but this is coming from the same people who ignore elite pedo prostitution rings involving their leaders. They don't give a shit about CP, much less actual child rape. That's just their excuse to try to restrict a branch of technology they're very afraid of and very much want to control.
It isn't about where the line is drawn but who gets to draw it. Ceding the least trustworthy people on earth that kind of power is downright dangerous. They already have too much.
One huge thing I think could come out of web 3.0 is decentralised dating. A dating system that isn't completely jewed and oriented towards a meat market would be hugely successful but a centralised version catering to trad Whites will never be permitted. A decentralised one would be much harder to take down.
Also when Madrid officials tested their sewer water samples from the previous year to find out when it got there they found it going back to summer 2019.
Wuhan would have been crawling with american and israeli spooks immediately before the outbreak. And then Israel "just happened" to have been working on a cure.
Homeschool coops are a much more sustainable model. Let parents teach the kids up to their early teens, then if they really need specialised instruction beyond that point there might be some point in hiring tutors and building a lyceum of some kind.