> not that false positives never happen but how many tests did that take? more likely, of course, is you were actually positive

Three. If I was actually positive then that still means the killer virus was so dangerous it was unnoticeable and I tested negative twice. A massive L for both the test and the virus.

> That does sound broken. Link?

No link, it was on a facebook group. I deleted my facebook account a while ago.

> That is not a valid test

So it should come back negative. If the test produces spurious positive results from bad sampling then it's a broken test.

> which is still low enough you could probably have nobody in your life

Exactly. On a global scale that's a very low number. Especially considering that all the flu season deaths were being counted as covid deaths.

> The result of letting covid run rampant in australia was where the carnage happened.

Funny how the countries with the strictest lockdowns and harshest treatments had so much carnage...

> No it doesn't. It causes *more* heart damage to antivaxxers.

So why aren't we dying? I've seen articles claiming we are but I haven't seen it actually happen to anyone I know.

> You have obviously not read any of the studies on this topic.

"The studies" are no more reliable than the TV. Academia has been lying out it's ass to uphold globalist narratives for a long time. I have no reason to expect them to become honest now. Meanwhile cold hard reality in front of my eyes says that covidiots are dying and anyone who avoided the jab is doing fine.