@WashedOutGundamPilot@SpurgAnon I understand why this would be a funny thought but they would 100% ban hentai just so their human trafficking business gets the whole pie
@ehhh@rlier23 it's moreso anti-AI rather than anti-csam. They don't give a shit about the materials used to generate images, just that images were generated.
@mia@ehhh@rlier23@SpurgAnon Remember back when the Borat guy accidentally uncovered a child sex ring in Vegas and then reported it to the FBI and they "decided not to pursue it"?
Well, I'd be more general and say that the US entertainment industry (which, yeah, is mostly Jewish but I don't think it's totally relevant in this case), is upset that anime and Japanese styled entertainment has totally displaced American entertainment. They are trying to control it, but at the same time also working to destroy it (in the case they can't control it). Japan is less prudish about what might be considered sexual themes in the west, and especially nudity, and so that's been one of their most successful strategies for attacking it.
The problem is, as always, how they'll define it. Shows like Bigmouth will get 7 seasons, and it won't count for some reason. Meanwhile they'll use it to police character designs of some rando on the internet. "Sorry, this jury thinks your character looks like a little kid, and since you drew wearing a bikini, you'll go to jail forever now".
@Elliptica@MeBigbrain@SpurgAnon "I can't believe the Hollywood Jews don't want me jacking off to ai simulated csam! What do you mean I'm a pedophile?!"
@ehhh@WashedOutGundamPilot@Kyonko802@SpurgAnon sorry but to me it still sounds like they are mainly focused on the issue of AI generating stuff that looks like CSAM of children, *not* lolis. the line about being able to generate children whether or not they actually exist isn't in reference to whether or not they are drawn, but whether the child physically exists in the real world and is being deepfaked or the generated child doesn't exist and but is being pulled from a bunch of reference images of children that do exist.
it would be like feeding a stable diffusion model a bunch of CP and a bunch of photos of your neighbor's kid, then using AI to generate CP of that kid, VS just generating things that look like they could be real children but actually aren't.
i don't think this has anything to do with loli. i think the term "realistic animations" that they use is not related to loli whatsoever because A) loli isn't realistic and B) someone saying "animations" doesn't automatically mean they are referring to anime. it could be animated deepfakes they're talking about. they never mention anything about drawings, or cartoons, it's all talking about existing CP being made into models to then make AI generated CP.
i don't think it even mentions the word "art" anywhere
@ehhh@WashedOutGundamPilot@Kyonko802@SpurgAnon they're probably talking about photorealistic AI images. where it's becoming harder and harder to tell if something is actually real or not.
> sorry but to me it still sounds like they are mainly focused on the issue of AI generating stuff that looks like CSAM of children, *not* lolis. the line about being able to generate children whether or not they actually exist isn't in reference to whether or not they are drawn, but whether the child physically exists in the real world and is being deepfaked or the generated child doesn't exist and but is being pulled from a bunch of reference images of children that do exist.
That's all well and good, but this is coming from the same people who ignore elite pedo prostitution rings involving their leaders. They don't give a shit about CP, much less actual child rape. That's just their excuse to try to restrict a branch of technology they're very afraid of and very much want to control.
@Beefki@Elliptica@MeBigbrain@SpurgAnon I think it's prudent to point out that you're asking a bunch of rustled pedos to actually read the article and respond to it in good faith. These morons pretend this is about vtubers and anime and the government coming for their innocent 'joy' because openly stating that they just want to keep jacking off to ai simulated csam would be more-or-less unpalatable to their target audience; namely lolbertarian pearl clutchers that might treat seriously questions such as "should the government be allowed to deny pedophiles their pornography." Here's a radical proposal for you; maybe criminalizing pedophiles is a good thing.
I don't think I said that, did I? Maybe you should slither back to kiwi farms. Crying about washed up e-celebs on a website fucked into the dirt by trannies seems to be closer to "your speed".
@Elliptica I think it's prudent to point out that the picture above is misleading. The ban is (currently) for photorealistic "art" that depicts child pornography, not anime style loli.
I'm of two minds on this. No victim no crime, it should be allowed to exist as long as there is no party harmed by it. But also I'm not really excited about having to worry if material is legal or not when it shows up.