Notices by NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)

I barely use 4chan anymore.

Actually the purpose of this debate is for Trump to IRL shitpost and for Biden to shit his pants. Everybody already knows who they're going to vote for and who they're going to rig for, and that includes Israel.

Not only do you not need to be the only one to fix everything, you actively refuse to let other people fix things. Here's you refusing to fix the poll display bug that conflates poll voters count with poll votes count and in turn makes the little chart display incorrectly: https://gitlab.com/soapbox-pub/soapbox/-/merge_requests/2917

Screenshots attached to illustrate the problem. Also what I posted is not a Pleroma bug, it's a SoapboxFE bug.

RT: https://gleasonator.com/objects/97a23ead-ec52-4889-8bc7-26220d2cb4fb

I considered using a notation system like that but decided against it because in a way that defeats the purpose of structured API calls and responses. If I do do something akin to XdY for dice_sum, I'd do it at the client level. Let them chop it up.

EDIT: Also, the results come in the order they're made, if that's what you mean. They're not sorted. The point of having a system field that's subject to Elixir's polymorphism is because that tells it how to interpret the rolls. In this case, it handles exploding dice and success counting.

So, I implemented the dice rolling for the Narration System that I made-up. It's now on production for IDDQD Social, although there's no FE for it yet. This one uses a dice pool system where you roll d12s for success at 9+ and dice explode at 11+. Here's how dice pools work in greater detail if you're not already familiar:

You pass it one positive integer that is the dice_pool. It rolls Xd12 dice, where X is equal to dice_pool. For every die that lands on 9 or above, it is counted as a "success." For each die that lands on 11 or above, you also re-roll them. These dice can be re-rolled over and over again. Notice how the dice_pool for the example is 14, yet there are 19 results. That's because of those dice, 5 of them landed on 11 or higher. So the dice_pool is one number, but the length of the results array is higher than that. This is defined, expected, behavior.

There is no FE for this yet, but you can still hit the endpoint:

You can read the commit here:

https://gitgud.io/thestranjer/balormo/-/commit/4a753cec0bf1c7e7da1129b677eabfbbd97fe3f6

It relies on Elixir's polymorphism to capture the right rng values, and uses an accumulator with recursion to loop through the dice_pool. I don't consider myself the best functional programmer but this does work. In the object / activity, it produces data that's shaped like this:

@p @jeffcliff @sun @dielan @rees @crunklord420 @Hoss @caekislove @Tfmonkey @lain @mint @Eiregoat

RT: https://iddqd.social/objects/084b8320-0abe-4ca8-90c6-2fe0dd8bd575

Right now my only intention is to put information that's intended to be visible to anybody who can see the object/activity in the first place. Hopefully that limits the security implications quite a bit, but we'll see.

You aren't harsh. You're whiny.

I clicked out of pretty much immediately. It looks like some 2005-2015 era Simpsons-but-slightly-edgier clone. Cuckservatives are always like a decade behind culturally.

We are still at zero (0) things you consider based that have nothing to do with your race politics