Is there such as thing as an #FOSS neighbourhood website server software? I don't mean druple, wordpress, or any other CMS with retrofitted plugins. But an honest to dog feature focused installable piece of software that provides some of the things like galleries and newsletters needed by #neighbourhood communities?
Good talks stick with you. And the co opting was a wake up call about how to me open source isn't enough. But also free software isn't enough and we just can't stop evolving our philosophical underpinnings
This week's "cautionary tales" about bosses that try to dictate the design of their worker's office spaces is very interesting. People reject things went they don't have control over their environment, even if it's "good design". Even steve jobs capitulated to his workers at pixar.
"You know, life, is always right. It is the architect who is wrong" - Pessac
But. I am enjoying the education in just how much I hallucinate the thoughts and feelings of other people and other social groups in order to construct a predictable social sense of my world. Rarely are lessons in humility detached enough from one's own pride to really think it over.
I think my social hallucinations can evolve only by listening more attentively to others.
I'm really unhappy with the #webdesign i did for the #Inkscape gallery on the website. Its... just not very good. Functional, barely, but not top of my proudest contributions. https://inkscape.org/gallery/ (the worst part is the voting y'all see next week :ac_fearful: )
Anyone here good with #css and #html and wants to contribute to a foss project? I got a gallery app that needs ground up reworking. :ac_flourish:
To my mind, "keep politics out of..." (The project, the dinner table, the office, etc) are more about our understanding that not all of our behavioural standards can be synchronised in all groups. To reduce effort, some topics fall into "agree to disagree" by default. But some of these topics have become important to foss projects and so they have to move into "we must talk and agree about this now".
You have been recruited by a mad south african billionaire who's invented a time travel machine. There's just enough fuel to send himself with a pocket full of diskettes to the early 1980s and he wants you to select the linux and foss packages which will be used to beat Microsoft and Apple. You must select software is a) runnable on the hardware of the time, b) plausibly of the era while c) better than anything then available.
This week's #inkscape video I talk about the contract to fix bugs for the 1.3 release, and getting paid by the Inkscape project vs. being sponsored privately. With both I should be able to work on Inkscape basically full time for the next couple of months. 🥳
Firstly; It's important to separate out Free Software charity from non-corporate work. Assuming there's only corporate and charity works... is incorrect. The vast majority of FS work is individual and small business needs. Not charity.
Large organisations can damage an open source project through sheer presence, very easily. The thumbs on the scale are *very large* and *very clumsy*
Better the giants stay away then try and be helpful
5. User experience research, design, outreach, documentation, moderation, administration and quality assurance are all real jobs, require labour and are deserving of professional respect and recognition. There's no place for coder pedestals even though programmers do have the most freedom, that doesn't make other contributions lesser.
6. Make spaces. Places dedicated to ux, with ux tools make a project inviting and give agency to non developers.
When I've worked on ux centric or driven projects for inkscape (see objects dialog) there is a large amount of extra effort needed to push the technology to do things, to flow in new ways. All that effort has to have resources and that support comes from a project that has the ability to invite wider populations to participate constructively.
The consensus building you mentioned isn't as useful if respect for non-developer contribution is missing.
MuseScore is interesting because it points to ux being incompatible with non hierarchical project organisation. I really hope this isnt the case, but it appears at least easier to force ux to be centered when you can direct people's work.
The best ux people are aggregate user avatars, the worst are opinionated bullies. Clear consensus building (sigh, politics) is what I've seen work well.
It's a community's responsibility to be safe and inviting to a breadth of speakers. An all male panel might be inevitable (i dont think it is) but it's still a social failure which we must reflect bitterly on until we figure out what correctives are required to reverse hyper narrow representation.
Your post lacked any lamentation, suggesting you don't see this as a failure.