Musk previously stated that Jones was not welcome on Twitter, supposedly due to the Sandy Hook incident. Perhaps 'strongly dislike' would have been a more appropriate term.
They've created some really terrible problems for themselves. The failed state of Israel wont likely exist much longer. European stock can no longer afford to protect the snakes from the enemies they've made.
The idiots actively work to demographically replace the only people remaining on the planet that would have anything to do with them. Every group hates them due to the way they behave. Then they foolishly say: 'fix your own problems', without understanding what that means.
How about we flood Israel with Africans, then tell them to solve their own problems? Perhaps that's not even necessary, how about just remove the active US assets from the Middle East region and let the Palestinians, Iranians, and jews solve their own problems.
No, muting and/or blocking exposes a weak mind. Don't engage if you can't handle mild push-back. This was a very light exchange. The guy was a pus that was unable defend against mild banter.
Muting gives dishonest people a way to walk away from a confrontation, and dishonestly claim some form of an intellectual victory. It's shows how weak some people really are.
> They'll typically next try to depublish the case under the rules of court, so it supposedly can't be cited.
This happens often and it prevents a certain level of accountability. As you said, they can then bring the judgements back up when it's beneficial to their cause.
Hopefully people will start to pick up on the marketing slogan: "Israel has a right to defend itself". This is meant to act as a position 'anchor'. If the anchor isn't challenged, then most discussion afterward is pointless. The interviewers know this. Politicians have been coached on how, and when, to frame this particular anchor.
Israel is occupying territory outside of the boundaries that were 'drafted' by the UN... using force. The Palestinians have responded to the encroachment, supported by Israeli military force... using force since legal doctrine has proven unsuccessful. Israel has neither moral or legal 'right to defend itself'.
It's going to be psychologically brutal for everyone if they continue along the current path. There probably isn't much discussion happening about volunteer enlistment. They can't meet goals now.
Conscription is probably the only option available. They're probably very aware that this will result in rebellion from the remaining founding-stock population. To counter this, they'll do as they've done many times throughout history; invoke the Insurrection Act to grant emergency authorities.
The internal conflict will be different due to demographics. The 'we're all the same' mask will have to be removed completely. Options about how to manage the internal conflicts are probably being discussed now. It will be much more serious than 'hide them in the attic'.
> The Insurrection Act has been invoked numerous times throughout American history for a variety of purposes. Presidents George Washington and John Adams used it in response to early rebellions against federal authority. President Abraham Lincoln invoked it at the start of the Civil War, and President Ulysses Grant used it to crush the first incarnation of the Ku Klux Klan in the 1870s. Several other presidents, including Andrew Jackson, Rutherford Hayes, and Grover Cleveland, have deployed troops under the Insurrection Act to intervene in labor disputes, invariably on the side of employers. Most famously, Presidents Eisenhower, Kennedy, and Lyndon B. Johnson all invoked the Insurrection Act during the civil rights movement to enforce federal court orders desegregating schools and other institutions in the South.
There were a lot of helmets in that crowd. This was 100% staged.
How can a person easily see though the fake? … just look at the ‘reporters’ body language and the listen to the tone of her voice. Real in-person conflict causes fight-or-flight responses to activate. Even the best are unable to mask it.
It looks as if they may have decided to pivot away from escalating this jew-op further. Military reporting outlets have made a noticeably hard pivot back towards pumping fear for the Asia-Pacific region.
This is aimed directly at low 90 IQ, English speaking, people. They can read the message well enough. However, they're often unable to envision the context in which the author drafts the message.
How many people in Gaza would know how to use the word, sortie, in an English sentence? How many people in Gaza (average IQ in the 80s) could draft that sentence? Also, the grammar and punctuation style immediately stands out. Keep in mind, the spoken language of Gaza Palestinians is Palestinian Arabic.
It's likely an AI generated message. They can now produce these messages in a quick and efficient manner.