Switzerland passes law requiring #OpenSource software in the public sector. "All public bodies must disclose the source code of software developed by or for them, unless precluded by third-party rights or security concerns" Well done @maemst, great work!
Notices by Simon Phipps (webmink@meshed.cloud)
-
Simon Phipps (webmink@meshed.cloud)'s status on Monday, 01-Jul-2024 23:54:56 JST Simon Phipps -
Simon Phipps (webmink@meshed.cloud)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Feb-2023 13:09:28 JST Simon Phipps @PhenomX6
That's not terribly helpful or kind. -
Simon Phipps (webmink@meshed.cloud)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Feb-2023 10:22:22 JST Simon Phipps @lightweight
All I am trying to explain is that adding yet more infra to the already tottering pile of legacy was not on the cards for the website migration or the (excellent) vendor doing it. The time will come but for now neither conspiracy nor hypocrisy is a fair accusation for any of the people involved. In fact sitting here at 1am after a full day fighting the actual enemies of software freedom it's pretty hurtful. -
Simon Phipps (webmink@meshed.cloud)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Feb-2023 10:21:54 JST Simon Phipps @downey Or (b) we already have it for historic reasons (it was set up by volunteer directors a long time ago) and it's a work of steady progress.
-
Simon Phipps (webmink@meshed.cloud)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Feb-2023 10:21:53 JST Simon Phipps @downey
There is nothing quite like the feeling of working your ass off in the FOSS community on a bunch of things only to be rewarded with someone deciding to criticise the bit you haven't done yet.It's even better when they build a conspiracy theory out of it and call you a hypocrite.
-
Simon Phipps (webmink@meshed.cloud)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Feb-2023 10:21:51 JST Simon Phipps @downey There are No. New. Actions. in this area, we are just using existing infra choices that have not come up for fixing yet.
In an ideal world one would have infinite resources to fix everything that's flawed every time it's observed. But sure, hate on everything we do because there are still flaws to fix. Just lay off the false conspiracy theories and hypocricy slurs because we're real people and that hurts us.
-
Simon Phipps (webmink@meshed.cloud)'s status on Friday, 27-Jan-2023 03:21:35 JST Simon Phipps @dentangle Frankly I find Zoom unusable in most cases on ChromeOS, while Jitsi and BBB keep working fine. I wonder if those of us who solve problems rather than complain about them need to do a bit more complaining...?
-
Simon Phipps (webmink@meshed.cloud)'s status on Thursday, 29-Dec-2022 08:58:04 JST Simon Phipps @lightweight
But calling open source software open source software doesn't involve an "F" so why is that indicative of antipathy towards copyleft? -
Simon Phipps (webmink@meshed.cloud)'s status on Thursday, 29-Dec-2022 06:59:37 JST Simon Phipps @dirkhh
Well yes, that was my point 😉 -
Simon Phipps (webmink@meshed.cloud)'s status on Thursday, 29-Dec-2022 06:59:33 JST Simon Phipps @sjvn
She was the one that took my deposition for that trial. No words. -
Simon Phipps (webmink@meshed.cloud)'s status on Thursday, 29-Dec-2022 06:59:28 JST Simon Phipps @msw @sjvn The great irony was if Android had used OpenJDK there might not have been a lawsuit.
-
Simon Phipps (webmink@meshed.cloud)'s status on Thursday, 29-Dec-2022 05:58:10 JST Simon Phipps @larsmb
I disagree somewhat. The VC sickness has sucked a lot of the air out of the room to be sure, but both MPL and EPL are still breathing, still copyleft and still considered open source.There is more to reciprocal licensing than just FSF licenses, and having work for software freedom through open source undermined by a proxy war against the *GPL is unhelpful.
The best way to address strip-miners is to call them out on it, not pitch open source vs free software.
-
Simon Phipps (webmink@meshed.cloud)'s status on Thursday, 29-Dec-2022 05:57:31 JST Simon Phipps @lightweight
I don't hear that skewed usage when I'm out representing OSI in Europe. Do you have any data to back up the assertion? @osi certainly does not treat open source as excluding reciprocal licensing, tacitly or expressly. -
Simon Phipps (webmink@meshed.cloud)'s status on Thursday, 29-Dec-2022 05:57:27 JST Simon Phipps @msw
I'm unclear of your point. I'm not disagreeing that big tech and their VCs have fought hard to make people fear reciprocal licensing. I am disagreeing that they have succeeded at making "open source" mean "no copyleft" except in the minds of advocates who already disliked OSI's impudence in defining a viable term for software freedom that didn't include "free", especially because it worked. -
Simon Phipps (webmink@meshed.cloud)'s status on Thursday, 29-Dec-2022 05:57:24 JST Simon Phipps @oemb1905
I have little patience for arguments about linguistic framing that also contrast "Permissive" vs GPL when the GPL is itself a permissive license. That usage is an indicator of a partisan actor.
https://meshedinsights.com/2021/01/27/all-open-source-licenses-are-permissive/ -
Simon Phipps (webmink@meshed.cloud)'s status on Thursday, 29-Dec-2022 05:57:18 JST Simon Phipps @lightweight
I'm pretty happy to call 'em all out when they abuse that word "permissive". The whole reason open source works is because it's all permissive and people who want you to think the GPL isn't are either trying to scare you away from it or define you as outside their clan.