Tell me again how #GenAI will extract meaningful trends from and answer queries about your data set.
Notices by Lars Marowsky-Brée 😷 (larsmb@mastodon.online)
-
Lars Marowsky-Brée 😷 (larsmb@mastodon.online)'s status on Friday, 09-Aug-2024 01:09:01 JST Lars Marowsky-Brée 😷 -
Lars Marowsky-Brée 😷 (larsmb@mastodon.online)'s status on Sunday, 07-Jan-2024 07:20:27 JST Lars Marowsky-Brée 😷 @foone I mean YOU are not saying it
-
Lars Marowsky-Brée 😷 (larsmb@mastodon.online)'s status on Saturday, 27-May-2023 02:19:00 JST Lars Marowsky-Brée 😷 Look, if a community uses rainbow colors for their logo in support of Pride Month and LGBTIQA* folks, and you object to it because this is not welcoming of all "religions" and beliefs and cultures, and how this makes you want to disengage - how do I politely put it?
You're the *other* target audience for this signaling. And it's working.
-
Lars Marowsky-Brée 😷 (larsmb@mastodon.online)'s status on Thursday, 30-Mar-2023 03:34:40 JST Lars Marowsky-Brée 😷 @torvalds Sure, unfortunately this will be used to reduce the investment into and availability of vaccination programs even in regions where resources need not be so constrained, for political expediency.
And often, such "guidance" becomes "rules" and vaccine access is denied, unless one pushes back significantly.
If this had a sentence "it likely benefits everyone, or does at least no harm, but we don't think it's worth it for everyone" - fair.
But it only ever includes the second part. -
Lars Marowsky-Brée 😷 (larsmb@mastodon.online)'s status on Thursday, 30-Mar-2023 03:04:11 JST Lars Marowsky-Brée 😷 Lovely, the #WHO recommendation for #Covid19 #vaccination is primarily driven by "cost effectiveness and opportunity costs", because why should an individual's health be paramount.
https://www.who.int/news/item/28-03-2023-sage-updates-covid-19-vaccination-guidance
-
Lars Marowsky-Brée 😷 (larsmb@mastodon.online)'s status on Thursday, 29-Dec-2022 05:57:27 JST Lars Marowsky-Brée 😷 @webmink @msw @lightweight @osi They may not have redefined the legal meaning, but they've definitely managed to narrow the perception of "normal" Open Source: that's now Apache, maybe MIT.
Anything else (AGPL terrifies users even) is considered "zealots only, unusable if it can be at all avoided, don't use for new code".
Libertarians; freedom is only desirable if it can be lopsidedly exploited and doesn't commit *them* to anything.
-
Lars Marowsky-Brée 😷 (larsmb@mastodon.online)'s status on Saturday, 24-Dec-2022 02:42:42 JST Lars Marowsky-Brée 😷 @StephanWindmueller @danimo Once you hit one of the limits of Firefox, there is no alternative to chromium anymore.
(e.g., I use it on desktop still, but can't on mobile - the Android SSL/TLS support is insufficient, and they're not able to fix it since literally a decade. And it's outside my skill set too.)
That's the complaint: Mozilla has not done their core job. Unless someone like the EU throws money at the problem, the monopoly engine has won.