@fraying I feel generally speaking, it becomes more obvious in recent years (maybe just to me), how liberalism and anarchism, while both being about personal choice and freedom, differ how one comes from a place of privilege, while the other comes from the opposite end of that spectrum.
EFF, and also the larger FOSS community, seem to have sprung up around liberal ideals, and are struggling to understand the non-privileged point of view.
@aral I always find it worth pointing out that the "paradox" of tolerance, as it's called, is only a paradox when you treat tolerance as a moral precept.
But it's not.
Tolerance is a social contract, intended to protect anyone who adheres to it.
People who deliberately break it? They opt out of the protections, too, not just the responsibilities.
@webmink@lightweight@osi@msw Well, I recall a few conversations by proponents of permissive licenses back in the 90s when the distinction was last pushed, and the explicit message of permissive licenses was "open for business, unlike copyleft".
Which means that skewed perception actually predates the use by Google et al, but Google certainly attracted a lot of people from the same camp in the beginning. I wouldn't consider either...
Building a people centric, next generation Internet with @interpeerLanguages: 🇩🇪 🇬🇧 🇮🇹 🇷🇴Pronouns: your choiceIPA: jɛns ˈfɪŋkˌhɔʏzɐTags: #p2p #interpeer #interpeerproject #privacy #encryption #foss #humanrightsAlso: #metalmittwochNazis: fuck 'em with a nail bat. :antifa:#web3 / #nft: is toxic and must dieMojo Jojo is my spirit animal. 337.40 ppm.All my toots are CC BY-NC-SA. No, scraping them for your LLM is not "sharing alike".