Notices by NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social), page 47

Also:

>No matter who you are or where you come from, most likely your hair–or lack thereof–is your identity.

Who comes up with this shit? I literally brush my hair with a pair of clippers and a 9mm guard every 2wks. I don’t think about my hair at all.

No, transforming the world like that would be absolutely terrible. What are you smoking, man? Imagine a world where nobody is allowed to have opinions.

Bro we need to basically just ban the Internet to make sure nobody can call John Shirley a kike on the computer.

It’s ridiculous, hilarious, and terrifying all at once. Dude could just calm the fuck down that someone out there finds him to be a massive faggot and leave it at that, but no, we need to transform the whole world to not allow that.

You really don’t understand this tool, though. It would be like asking someone to invent a pen that doesn’t let you write racial slurs with it. It’s on that level of demand.

The Constitution does say that all cases brought under it will go to one supreme court, so there is a provision for it. But the thing with all documents is that they’re just paper if unenforced. Part of getting to the point where a document does get enforced, however, involves making the general population believe in that document.

Well, that’s the thing. It’s all cyclical. You’re only saying you want a King now because so much of the population is irreparably corrupted. America during its founding wanted a republic because the King at the time was a sack of shit and the general population was pretty virtuous.

“Bro just crown a hereditary line which never has a corrupt or retarded prince”

Lol, good luck, lmao. We’re just going to start with this shit all over again.

“Bro we’ll just replace the corrupt king with another non-corrupt king”

That’s not how it worked out either, in Western history. The monarch in the UK gradually lost direct control. It’s how we got “democracy” in the first place.

That’s fair, sorry for misunderstanding you. I guess the unfortunate reality is that all these institutions are being treated like obstacles to overcome rather than things that are to be respected. You’ll notice the two “sides” in America will bluntly reject the legitimacy of SCOTUS, the presidency, whoever, if they don’t get their way. That’s not a good sign for the republic.

lmao

The announce is Shao Kahn, and the voice actor is Steve Ritchie: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZTli8nOfOM

Bacon Coming, Bitch Soon

“Bro your society begins and ends at cities bro dude bro trust me just one more apartment complex bro just one more commie block bro just one more bus stop just one more bro we just need one more.”

I lived in a high crime city in a 700sqft apartment while I was in college. Saw things like knife fights outside of my apartment routinely. Neighbors had various kinds of vermin and no matter how much I cleaned I kept having to deal with them. Yes, this is typical of city life globally.

This doesn’t even put a dent in my point. It vindicates it.

What kind of “systemic change” are you hoping for that doesn’t just amount to banning anybody who disagrees with you?