Notices by JohnYoungE (johnyounge@poa.st)
-
@judgedread @PHarrghis Well, we can make some inferences.
Jews were in America from its very inception.
While less than 1% of White people owned slaves, 40% of Jews did.
Your standard-issue African-American descended from slaves is 25% White in terms of DNA. White DNA is close enough (i.e. Caucasoid broadly) to Jewish DNA that they likely made no distinction.
So most of that "White" DNA in blacks is probably Jewish. That would make sense considering the the rate at which even perverse White men rape Black women is zero.
This would explain the sense of Black entitlement and perpetual victimization.
Among the White population it is hard to say, but we can look at the statistics on outmarriage of Jews. Most of this outmarriage would be with Whites. That outmarriage rate is astonishingly high -- something like 40% among the Reformed, which is the largest segment of Jews. Anecdotally (i.e. from discussions with Jews) this is largely driven by the fact that even Jews don't like Jews, and they don't want their kids to be Jewy.
Looking at genetic distance maps, while someone who was 50/50 would probably retain a lot of Jewishness, someone who was 25/75 would generally not have any reinforced Jewish traits -- certainly none of the recessive ones.
As odd as it may sound, I have known both 100% Jews and 50% Jews who were/are seriously pro-White and anti-Jewish, because they believe Jewish behavior needs to be regulated by strong White forces for it not to be terminally destructive.
I would not trust such people in the inner circle of a plan to remove all Jews from the planet, but they can be useful in the outer circles and to provide intelligence and insight that can inform tactics overall.
-
A standard 7.62x39 has eleven feet of drop at 500 yards.
And your standard AK ain't exactly a tack driver.
-
@WilhelmIII @Eleutheria2 @WhiteApe True! FAL is very under-rated. Great platform.
-
@judgedread @SpoopyAnon Looks like a very depressed area in the first place according to poverty, income and home prices.
It would seem to me that plopping a bunch of new arrivals (even if they were White and highly qualified) into a place that clearly has something structural going wrong economically is a bad idea unless that underlying issue is fixed first.
-
@judgedread 100% true.
People who are struggling to survive are not in a position to organize resistance. And the choice of Haitians was specifically to inflict maximum damage at every level damage can be done.
-
@TrevorGoodchild @Rasterman Shockingly low numbers.
-
@Escoffier @KingOfWhiteAmerica @Sulla_Felix @James_Dixon @somemightsay My understanding from studying the early church is that the "Elders" would be the presbyters, and that there were two types of elders -- the ruling elders, and generally one teaching elder, who was what was called the Bishop. Serving under the elders were helpers -- deacons.
But there was no higher authority in the individual local church than this Bishop -- i.e. teaching elder. Or what we might call the pastor. Although Paul certainly tried to serve the function of an "overseer of bishops (i.e. the spiritual leaders of individual churches)" this was in very early days, and nowhere does scripture endorse the existence of archbishops, cardinals, etc.
As for apostolic succession -- I am rather iffy that this is at all unbroken if, in the line, you find men such as popes who fucked married women and had their husbands murdered etc etc etc. Although all people sin, the idea that someone can engage in THAT level of evil AFTER installation as Pope and be a valid apostle is not sane. And multiple such popes existed prior to the schism with the orthodox.
So I do not buy that an actual meaningful person-to-person succession actually exists. Rather, the succession is one of the spirit, not the physical. That said, the installation of a Bishop/Pastor that includes the laying on of the hands of others already in the ministry of that denomination DOES (at least in theory) assure the orthodoxy of the newly installed Bishop's doctrine.
However, the very existence of hundreds of Christian denominations and borderline schism even within those -- with the founders of nearly all of these having been previously ordained by the laying on of hands of a bunch of ministers of the existing denomination -- demonstrates the ineffectiveness of this.
Either way, I don't think that just because someone thinks he can trace his ordination back 200 generations, that makes it any more valid automatically than someone who cannot. The validity is determined by the fruit -- true faith and doctrine, proper administration of the sacraments, etc.
That said, I think people see schism backwards in some cases.
An institutional denomination can fall away from the true faith and doctrine or engage in egregious institutionalized sin. In these cases, those who break away because they still adhere to the true faith and doctrine are deemed the "schismatics" even though they are the ones doing what is religiously right.
In that respect I would actually see what both the Orthodox and Martin Luther did as completely valid. (And with only minor differences I actually consider true Lutheranism and Orthodoxy to be the same faith. One would best consider true Lutheranism to be the German Orthodox church.) Schism can thus serve to preserve the true doctrine on one hand, and also a way to get heretics out of the church on the other.
But beyond all this, Christ promised that his Church (consisting of the priesthood of all believers) would be preserved until the end.
So I believe the actual Church -- this priesthood of all believers -- IS fighting against trannyism etc. We see these as individuals and small groups -- but they are there, and their faith is driving them.
This should be seen as separate from entities with government/satanic subsidies (i.e. many institutional churches today, including Catholic, Orthodox and Lutheran in some countries). The fact that entities basically funded (directly or indirectly) by government would fail to oppose its satanic initiatives is not shocking.
However, Christ's Church is not the same thing. And that church still fights.
-
@patris @James_Dixon @Escoffier @KingOfWhiteAmerica @Sulla_Felix @somemightsay I am part of such a congregation, and there is indeed singing. We think the enlightenment is crap, refer to Jews as antichrist and our teenage boys get taught shooting etc.
-
@MoeBritannica And this explains why, in spite of my capacity to do so, I do not contribute to open source projects. It is not worth it to me to have my every code comment or pull request phrasing nitpicked by people who, in a sane world, would be composted.
-
@judgedread I think the billionaire kikes will likely lose power in the near future, simply because their mis- and mal-management doesn't occur in a vacuum.
If the societies they control were even remotely well run, I suspect most wouldn't care who or what they were. But the reality is they've created a bunch of unavoidable collision courses in a world where the societies they control aren't the only power, and furthermore their totalitarian is soft.
Soft totalitarianism works fine with relatively minor opposition to pick off onesie twosies and keep everyone else in line. But it won't work when shit breaks down to such an extent that people are actually hungry.
Soft totalitarianism scales much better than the hard style. The soft style can work through leverage, automation and just a handful of actually competent people loyal to the regime. But hard totalitarianism requires a substantial subset of the population to be both loyal AND competent.
Things are going where hard totalitarianism will be needed, and I honestly don't think they'll be able to scale it.
Half of all young men under 30 have never had sex. Ever. 95% of all jobs created since covid have gone to anything BUT white men. They have created an ever growing pool of young white men who have little or nothing to lose.
Statistics
- User ID
- 115385
- Member since
- 22 Apr 2024
- Notices
- 10
- Daily average
- 0
JohnYoungE
All ０７６萌ＳＮＳ content and data are available under the