Notices by That Would Be Telling (thatwouldbetelling@shitposter.club), page 5

@AidanTTIerian @djsumdog @johnbudd1350 Wrong Jew to target, I think (and BlackRock hasn’t snapped up that much residential real estate to begin with, and correct me if I’m wrong but I think they’re now not trying to catch a falling knife??).

Blame AA (woman) (((Janet Yellen))) for not restraining “Biden’s” wild spending. (((Antony Blinken))) for absolutely retarded in multiple areas foreign policy that’s increased lots of prices including for food and fuel. Blame the usual suspects for the war of fossil fuels and growing food, plenty of whom are Jewish. BlackRock has played a double game there, Jews aren’t entirely to blame for the partial withdrawal of normal funding for fossil fuels.

Figure out who’s to blame for shutting down so many coal fired power plants in the US (I can provide some pointers to policies).

That’s a large fraction of the causes of inflation, which to avoid hyperinflation the Fed (which is not run by a Jew, but I haven’t looked at its governance below Powell) is doing the only thing they can, break things and kill people raise interest rates. Lived through this in the late 1970s and early 1980s, wasn’t fun but the alternative is worse.

@SaltWraith @SassHole @Nike Find it very hard to imagine this proposed LGB | TIQA+ divorce is going to be more than a fringe thing.

The LGB’s are deeply embedded in the Left including a great deal of Team Red, which we should note “can’t even conserve little girl’s rooms” and is generally failing to fight World War T. That means among other things they have no political home; can you imagine them going to the mat for DeSantis?!??!!???

@PhenomX6 @fatepony Do we have effective samizdat or as I like to call it after the web site name samizdata networks?

Many many reasons that may have had a degree of effectiveness in the USSR which aren’t true here. Like a lack of alternatives.

Or let me fast forward to the only scenario where I see us winning: a preference cascade. Being prepared to capitalize on that does fit into the model of suppressed communications we live under.

@PhenomX6 @fatepony “On the other hand there’s a few important ways to counter this. The first is to archive everything….”

This is like the scheme of doing your own recording when you speak to the media. Like Wikipedia, they have the megaphone, you don’t, effectively no one will ever see the archived copy of the truth or whatever.

@coolboymew @smug @Moon Of course this is academic as long as the totalitarian tech Left is a literal arm of the Deep State as shown in the Twitter Files, and even if they weren’t Joseph Nacchio was a stark object lesson in what would happen if you refused the Deep State’s “requests.”

But back in the day, the FCC had two options to regulate the Internet, either as an old fashioned utility and that would have been insane, just as creating such regulations in their early days would have been (perhaps aside from radio frequency allocation, but that was quasi-instantly abused).

Or as “enhanced” telecom providers or whatever, was a key word in the category.

Here while it would be fairly easy to regulate the basic infrastructure now that it’s well developed, we have the same problem in that social media is quite new compared to the Internet, although perhaps not so new it couldn’t be regulated in a sane way.

But again see the first problem, as long as we are ruled by a genocidal hostile elite that’s the problem that has to be solved, sane government after that … well history isn’t too encouraging, but we’ll see, or perhaps the younger of you or your descendants.

“Why Big Tech will lose its Supreme Court case on section 230

“I only count two votes to ratify Big Tech’s sweeping immunity claims”

A very interesting analysis of the oral arguments for Gonzalez v. Google where the former takes the latter to task for serving up ISIS content to people who like that sort of thing.

This hinges on the protection every one of us reading this is depending on to immunize our service providers; we, not they are on the hook for anything illegal or tortuous we do, WRT to previously established law we’re the publishers.

But service providers like AOL noted it was in the public interest for them to be able do a level of filtering to in their case (try to) create family safe spaces and that’s a publishing role.

The Gonzalez case; well, let me quote Justice Kagan, who’s intellectual chops were questioned after nomination, but compared to the Wise Latina and now the negro who can’t define “woman” who also can’t stop talking in these oral arguments…:

“Justice Kagan also sees that section 230 doesn’t really fit the modern internet. The Court’s job, she seems to say, is ‘to figure out how … this statute which was a pre-algorithm statute applies in a post-algorithm world.’ She thinks the plaintiff’s reading could ‘send us down the road such that 230 really can’t mean anything at all.’ She’s daunted by the difficulty of refashion the statute to avoid over-immunizing Big Tech:”

And continues with the biggest issue of what sort of line can you realistically draw; this is hard.

Here attacking algorithmically suggesting to someone who likes [ISIS] videos more [ISIS] videos is weak sauce to label someone a publisher. Heck, you can’t even impute intent, what about scholars?

TL;DR: the real world is messy.

https://reason.com/volokh/2023/02/27/why-big-tech-will-lose-its-supreme-court-case-on-section-230/

@Moon

@ArdainianRight @xue @blitzed @pcachu Thing is it’s not necessarily manipulation. Scary thing is that it’s self-organizing, that’s frequently much worse than manipulation including astroturfing a set of people.

See the US Right going straight into the loony bin with COVID vaccinations for a self-organizing example on that side, no matter how much some people like Nolte claimed many were dying to “own the libs.” (I might give them a partial pass because of how the Left has systematically excluded them from science higher education, but it starts at the high school level of biology. After three years no one has an excuse for not (re-)learning the relevant basics like DNA->mRNA->proteins, that is, no “gene therapy.”)

Holiness spirals are a old phenomena, where people gain status and frequently power by being more holy than their peers, or keeping up with them or whatever; the very nature of it being a spiral means the Party Line is constantly changing.

Independent of politics where the modern Left started with this in the French Revolution you can see this throughout history in religious movements and of course cults. Of course modern Leftism is a religious movement with plenty of sub-cults, they just don’t claim typical sorts of god except maybe Earth which is of course a relevant one here.

@xue @blitzed A bit of truth about global cooling global warming climate change. It’s always been a crusade against technological civilization, with a side helping of genocide.

@SaltWraith @Ottovonshitpost @Umlaut @Platinum @LouisConde @Twoinchdestroya @WashedOutGundamPilot @ferrarilegends “Sadly the jewish blood libel is there too, with the GASSING of colonies”

Maybe. Gassing of inhabited entities in space with a finite body of air is an old and very obvious trope, Doc Smith used it for example in the core story of Triplanetary published in 1934.

Plus of course the Federation (at the time) Titans did it as well, they were perhaps much more the Space Nazis of the series with their dark blue or black uniforms … except for the Duchy of Zeon helmets which were clearly modeled on the Stahlhelm.

Does the original First Gundam TV even go into this gassing/extermination of Sides 1, 2 and 4 detail?? I don’t remember it from the movies, but by the time the series started it old news, heck Zeon had pretty much run out of colonies to gas…. Was banned by the Antarctic Treaty which the Gundam Wiki credibly claims became defunct after the One Year War but that still expressed principles the Federation held to for a very long time.

I don’t consider 0083 Tomino canon and as a general principle such treaties deal with the initiation of war crimes, not subsequent responses in kind once a side forfeits a treaty’s protection, but I don’t know if that nuance was known by writers back then.

See the WWII example of Germany and the US having poison gas, the latter in theater but not using it (Germany with its interior lines didn’t need to bother). And of course the Delaz Fleet very explicitly didn’t give a damn about the treaty and I read now about the old Duchy of Zeon (would you want to associate yourself any more with the Zabis than you had to??).

And of course this sort of thing gets … flexible in the exigencies of war. For once Imperial Japan’s military intelligence both got the details of the invasion of Kyuushuu right and was believed, blowing the initial plan for Operation Olympic. Those who didn’t know about the Manhattan Project were planning on liberal use of poison gas, and in one comment I haven’t tried to confirm had started to move it in theater. It was iffy since the type cited was prone to catastrophic polymerization, that releases a lot of heat and makes a bomb spontaneously go boom.