Notices by That Would Be Telling (thatwouldbetelling@shitposter.club), page 3

“Would you believe….”

That the head of the American Medical Association (AMA) who completely supports “gender affirming care” is gay and based on family name, physiognomy, and the above two facts is almost certainly a Jew??

OK, he’s a bit unusual in being a Log Cabin Republican (the Official group of literally Gay Old Pedobears) and reading between the lines having the military pay for his medical education. Which isn’t a super burden, your career as a doctor isn’t much different than it would be in civilian life. Ah, actually perhaps a bit better in not worrying about getting paid.

Then again, he used the service resulting from the latter to start pushing World War T on the military in 2015. Hard to think of a group that’s worse for an effective modern military. And now we a Space Force three star female general saying:

‘Transformational cultural change requires leadership from the top, and we do not have time to wait,’ Burt began. ‘Since January of this year, more than 400 anti-LGBTQ+ laws have been introduced at the state level. That number is rising and demonstrates a trend that could be dangerous for service members, their families, and the readiness of the force as a whole.’

‘When I look at potential candidates, say for Squadron command, I strive to match the right person to the right job,’ she continued, adding, ‘I consider their job performance and relevant experience first. However, I also look at their personal circumstances, and their family is also an important factor.

If a good match for a job does not feel safe being themselves and performing at their highest potential at a given location, or if their family could be denied critical health care due to the laws in that state, I am compelled to consider a different candidate, perhaps less qualified.’”

Because asking an officer in the US military to not groom children, or mutilate their own, or themselves is unthinkable today.

And if you’ve wondered how fake and gay the “Biden” Space Force has become look at this swearing in ceremony when she transferred to the it in 2021; The Force is Female after all: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:CFSCC%E2%80%99s_Combined_Space_Operations_Center_hosts_first_International_Space_Day_celebration_(2).jpg

https://www.dailywire.com/news/space-force-general-admits-shed-prioritize-gender-surgery-access-over-qualified-officers

“Can we just all agree between ‘Trans-Genocide’ and now ‘Rainbow Underground Railroad’ these are the most insulting narcissistic non-serious privileged assholes to walk the planet?”

https://twitter.com/FiveTimesAugust/status/1669855362151792642

And the article reporting on this insanity, which may be a real estate broker scam:

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/rainbow-underground-railroad-helps-lgbt-americans-escape-red-states

@VIcFury @mmmfeet “We can help them by calling out anyone who says children are a burden in any way.”

Do you mean that at net? Because on the negative side of the ledger they certainly can be, and there are also phases like the “terrible twos.” There’s also the risk you’ll bear a disabled child who’ll consume much more of your time, energy, etc. and do that for all their life. That’s something my early Silent Generation mother noted at one point to me and maybe some of my siblings; low probability but should be weighted.

Of course a parent like this can make the “burden” come true and often if not generally through all too common child abuse, although consuming around nineteen years of your life falls rather short of “ruin your life.” I suppose that perspective is not something the younger set tend to appreciate, I was probably unusual in trying to think things through to the year 2000, which was a convenient milestone a bit before middle age.

As for not attacking them, how many can be redeemed??? I suppose it really doesn’t matter as long as there’s at least one, which we know will statistically happen and have mostly likely read or seen examples of.

@VIcFury @mmmfeet And there are other dimensions to it than the personal burden:

“Kids are cute but they’re not really eco-friendly.”

First reply is from Musk himself, who however tangled his relationships are, has 6-8 children, and lost one to World War T. Plus the first one not counted in the above for real to SIDS.

So back to this message that having kids will burden the Goddess Gaia, I know that’s been a theme since at least the 1970s.

Related is the apocalyptic “don’t bother” messages. Might be some premillennial dispensationalists, sounds inherent to their conceit. In the Cold War the Soviets really pounded on the nuclear apocalypse theme.

Going back to the environmentalists, they claimed much the same with much greater certainty starting with global cooling in the 1960s.

Before then world hunger was a big issue, you can see Heinlein taking it up … then again, Farmer in the Sky really uses it to set up the story, but it still had to be credible in 1950. And is also a necessary setup detail in The Moon is a Harsh Mistress in 1966.

Can’t think of where else in his writings, but “finish your plate, children are starving in India” was a trope my parents used, who as early Silent Generation members at least knew hunger second hand.

They grew up on farms, but would have known some of the 25% of the US population the USDA correctly estimated were malnourished by FDR (and if you think deliberately doing that is impossible, see Michelle Obama starving public school kids). Food was a pretty big deal to them…,.

https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/1670423265490206721

HT: https://instapundit.com/590419/ which ends with:

“The San Francisco Chronicle tells its readers that ‘There is nothing more bacchanalian than a kid’s birthday party,’ which may be one reason why: San Francisco is the most childless major city in the U.S.”

@MarchionessDawn @lain Naw, he was Nixon!!!, infamous anti-Communist, one of the necessary men in bringing Alger Hiss, spy/agent for the Soviets to justice starting in the late 1940s.

He was intensely hated long, long before he became President, see for example the utterly loathsome editorial cartoonist (((Herblock))) say “This shop gives every new President of the United States a free shave” on dropping that part of his normal caricature after the 1968 election.

And bringing Nixon down was just part of the post-Wilson modern Left’s MO, every Republican president following that disaster was axiomatically illegitimate, all Officially Fascists except for Eisenhower who was painted as being too old and not really running the Executive (totally untrue for the latter). All Republican Presidential candidates starting with Dewey (!) Officially Nazis.

Nixon was in fact a very significant moral upgrade after JFK and LBJ, but the rules were changed on him as the (((New Left))) steadily gained power in the 1960s-70s. Probably wouldn’t have been elected except in part in response to the New Left. see for example the infamous but misnamed “Law and Order” political cartoon https://youtu.be/lV_14O5wuDM run in 1968

it’s all about order in the face of … well, count all the Jewish radical faces featured starting with the first one; his campaign ran a different one name “Crime” on the soaring crime rates which soon led to movies like Death Wish and Dirty Harry. He and his VP (“nattering nabobs of negativism”) were willing to be culture warriors, Reagan too in a different style/delivery, somewhat like you see Trump and DeSantis in this century, the Bushes of course being totally Establishment.

I became politically aware during Nixon’s first four years and can assure you the ending you claim he forced of “the U.S’ Biochemical warfare and radiation experiments on U.S citizens” had nothing to do with it. Not even sure what you’re claiming about “radiation experiments,” for example the Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty which ended US and Soviet testing except underground was in 1963, part of a campaign by the latter that hoodwinked Eisenhower and JFK.

Nixon did play a decisive role in ending our offensive bioweapons program, you might describe his as a Quaker who was hired to end the Vietnam War. As an officer in the Navy during WWII he’s noted for being the commander of an important base island in the Pacific and the lots of legal work winding the war effort down.

@Jim Indeed. But it’s worse in that the former President is a current direct political opponent of the current one who’s seeking reelection.

The big thing, though, that kills republics stone cold dead is going after former leaders like a president. When you can’t afford to lose power, you make very sure you don’t lose power (unless you’re an idiot like Trump).

@Sweetie_Squad_Liquidator @Jim Exactly how persistent was the Trump small c constitutional order you celebrate??

You also vastly underestimate how literally gay his administration was, for example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Grenell And note how he’s attacking DeSantis from the Left on Florida’s systemic and genuinely painful attacks on wokeness. I don’t think we can have any confidence on what a second Trump administration would be like in this area.

Seriously, the #1 advantage Trump has is that he doesn’t hate white people. Beyond that….

I’m inclined to say you are an idiot for not noticing all that, “Lada MAGA” etc. etc., and like him for not thinking this through, how his insouciance allowed the entirely predictable election theft in 2020.

No excuse for not practicing CONSTANT VIGILANCE!

“Florida beachgoers shocked when bear emerges from Gulf of Mexico”

https://www.upi.com/Odd_News/2023/06/12/bear-beach-Destin-Florida/7781686580134/

@MarchionessDawn @D00B More like damage children young so they’ll become bioleninists: https://spandrell.com/2018/01/21/leninism-and-bioleninism/

This sort of damage tends to be incurable, is definitely so for children subjected to “gender affirming healthcare,” so….

@Remi @mia @AnimeTradCath @D00B @thendrix “I also found a more recent one saying that police will not take action because it was ‘consensual.’”

The whole concept of statutory rape is based on ages where sex cannot be consensual. Whatever might be argued about teens, only literal pedophiles argue six year old can give consent.

@Owl @Zerglingman @mimorinka “Hybrid vigor is bullshit”

It’s a simplification of something that works for things like corn, when you start from a couple of inbred AKA purebred varieties, and experience tells us getting two alleles for a number of genes makes a much better plant for the resulting generation.

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heterosis Ignore the “Major histocompatibility complex in animals” [citation needed], pretty sure we’ve known since the 1970s or earlier that’s not how it works. On the other hand the Flynn effect discussion at the end sounds legit.

There’s extremes of human inbreeding that are obviously bad, see Arabs etc. and other races that practice cousin marriage and their birth defect rates for example. And you’d expect early humans to have suffered from the same sorts of things depending on how much out-breeding happened from war or culture or whatever. We also went through a very narrow genetic window when something reduced our total numbers to, what, ~40K?

One of the most interesting things about Ashkenazi Jews was their ability to pull off a human eugenic program that is at net successful, but does have the characteristic higher rate of birth defects as well as the physiognomy that makes it so easy to detect a lot of them (and to the extent that makes them objectively ugly on an absolute scale it also supports the program; see tribes/ethnic groups that mutilate their children’s appearance around/before puberty). IQs well below 100 suggest Mizrahi and Sephardi Jews failed.

But back to the thesis, if you don’t start with purebred humans which we obviously haven’t created (it would take centuries for one thing) then it’s rolling a great many dice with seriously different outcomes. For example, I look very much like one parent, my siblings while not as close look like the other parent, like in overt things like eye colors. And we all got bad allergies from one parent which isn’t at all good. But my IQ is absolutely the result of “hybrid vigor” which maybe one sibling shares to a moderate degree.

But that’s from Northeastern European parents, and in the common US pattern also resulted in a major jaw/tooth size mismatch for myself, requiring orthodontics including the removal of one set of semi-molars to make room for the rest minus the wisdom teeth later.

When we get to wildly different human races like the three big ones, the possibilities have got to really explode; also see how dominate negro genes are in mulattoes like Obama, fully white mother, fully African father. I wonder if anyone has any good data on the details of this, since it violates the (((blank slate fallacy))) and so many other Jewish intellectual movements and programs (as usual, see https://www.unz.com/book/kevin_macdonald__the-culture-of-critique/ for how those work, as or like cults vs. SCIENCE!!!).

But we do know of plenty of specific examples where it just doesn’t work well at net, and at an extreme example of two species, see mules, an infertile donkey/cross that (when successful???) has advantages as a work animal. Which of course is how Jews view us.

@Spergo1875 @PinochetsCommieCopter “Progress over perfection.”

I’m not communicating well. I’m trying to get across how I see this one gambit just won’t work at all, is not “progress.” Demanding a reasonable chance at success is not demanding perfection.

@Spergo1875 @PinochetsCommieCopter And we do need to be thinking now about what to do if this campaign to “protect kids” is going to be successful.

The GOPe has been either forced, and/or is smart enough to see how for example it threw Virginia to them when it was thought that Purple state was getting locked up by the Dems. But it’s palpable how their hearts aren’t into it.

And as many have mentioned, a bad outcome in the fight transing kids is success, or success to a degree, and then the Right goes back to business as usual.

One note: Jews have been pretty good at hiding their actions pushing World War T; we should for example be seeing a lot more about how the Pritzkers, especially since the troon and the Governor of Illinois are so damn ugly….

We also have a problem where the gay agenda has been almost entirely successful including on the normie Right including Trump, and how that gets deliberately confounded with World War T.

@Spergo1875 @PinochetsCommieCopter Given that there are medical arguments for circumcision and obvious limits to how much harm it causes it sounds like much tougher ground on which to fight.

How much of this is for an attempt to then slip to the JQ?

@Spergo1875 @PinochetsCommieCopter Indeed on the group most protesting it, but again, there’s medical arguments, not “exceptions” for circumcision.

The arguments for poisoning, sterilizing, castrating, and sexually molesting children so they won’t want to or be able to reproduce naturally are … less strong. That’s the only reason conservatives are lifting a finger to quite modestly restrict these practices, and only for those under eighteen while allowing “sanctuaries” where these crazy people can go to anyway.

So you’re choosing difficult if not impossible ground to get at a target that while deserving, again has medical arguments in their favor. Worse, you’re trying to do them a small injury per Machiavelli that doesn’t affect any of their real strengths.

In fact, there are very very few successful eugenic systems in history (overproduction of higher classes and their replacing low reproduction lower classes like in England is another example), they could and should argue circumcision is a Chesterton’s fence they should not be forced to abandon.

@Spergo1875 @PinochetsCommieCopter “No one protest, argument, display of activism is going to win the war outright. They hit us from from any angle whenever they can, even when it’s a laughable attempt. We need to do the same to them. Hit them from every angle within the bounds of the law.”

What makes you think that strategy is a good one today or in the foreseeable future. Is that how they started gaining serious power in the US in the last 19th Century?

And look at how effective Jewish hard and soft power is at countering all levels of opposition to them, from indirect, completely not targeted at them like, oh, Trump, to the more direct stuff where the GOPe is more on their side than the Democrats….

I don’t think you’re being as “wise as serpents.”

@Smirking Interesting. “Dems are the real racists” has been a concept if not a trope/meme since the 1960s, probably further back, since “the solid South” was an essential part of the Democratic coalition going back to at least FDR. For an overt example, see Wallace breaking with the party and running a strong, spoiling type of campaign for President in 1968, won four Deep South states plus Arkansas.

And their general conservatism was a brake on FDR’s ambitions, especially since prior Democratic party screwups/down right evil like Wilson’s in WWI left them with seniority in the party after Hoover’s horrible response to 1929 ruined the GOP for generations at the national level. See the GOPe crow to this day about how their votes put one or more “civil rights” acts over the top under LBJ, which along with the Supreme Court created a new Constitution after FDR’s previous change of it.

In modern times, I can’t remember who turned this into a limp meme, obviously the Democrats completely ignore it so it only gets traction, to the extent it gets any, with some of the center and of course the negroidolatrous Right. I can see Federal felon Dinesh D’Souza using it a lot, although he wouldn’t have become politically prominent until going to Dartmouth in 1979 and the Dartmouth Review becoming a big thing from its 1980 start.

@polarisera @dave @sim @coolboymew You’ve got the correct angle. Refer to Pournelle’s Iron Law of Bureaucracy for the start of all this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerry_Pournelle#Pournelle’s_laws here’s the short form:

“In any bureaucracy, the people devoted to the benefit of the bureaucracy itself always get in control and those dedicated to the goals that the bureaucracy is supposed to accomplish have less and less influence, and sometimes are eliminated entirely.”

Expand that to people’s entire lives. Unless lightening strikes like with Bud Light (and even then the marketer and her direct report are not officially fired), not “offending the nazi hicks” means they lose their jobs, careers, and social circles. Again, they don’t care about the company’s welfare, they care about their own.

Going a bit deeper, they’re stuck in a modern Left, born in the French Revolution, holiness spiral. Even if they aren’t trying to improve their holiness, particularly important if they’re white and even more if white males, just keeping up with the current Party Line requires regular effort and shifting ever more to the Left.

@jmw150 @grey @kroner “White supremacist terrorists are so hard for the FBI to recruit that they had to issue an H1B visa for one”

https://twitter.com/Oilfield_Rando/status/1661009126649110528

@somebody112 @PinochetsCommieCopter Indeed. There are negroes who came to a bad end at white hands they could get a lot of “white supremacists” to sympathize with.

Ones we in the RKBA community spontaneously did like Eric Garner if for no other reason than we could put ourselves in their shoes and see the police doing this to us. But while Garner gets a few mentions, and Philando Castile essentially none (perhaps because he was legally carrying a gun), the ones they elevate to the level of martyred saints are all scumbags, in life and death are as you say people who “fuck with ‘white society’.”

Ones anyone who pays attention knows are scumbags. Here Jordan Neely notoriously went from a “harmless” character to seriously mentally nine years ago. Was violating his parole for breaking bones in that 67 year old lady’s face, which included staying on his meds. Something the NYC system just wasn’t serious about despite his being in a “top 50” list for dangerous people frequenting the subway system (they had a parallel list for those who didn’t).