Starts to be quite a few. It's weird to make a federation protocol in this day & age and not consider peering difficulties and inability to communicate directly (fuck, #Usenet does it better via #UUCP & #NNCP).
China isn't the only regime with a hard-on for censorship and utter disregard for the sanctity of networks after all. That should have been part of the design considerations.
@mint@roboneko@i2p@torproject@z3r0fox Ah, I'd been under the impression some directly shared Activities in a manner that required active support from the instance software with the goal of full eventual consistency between relay peers.
As for honeypots, it doesn't really matter, I don't trust email to remain confidential overall (much of it I use solely for registrations or posting to public mailing lists anyway), I just want different identities to remain compartmentalized.
@jeff@xianc78@dalias@Obdurodon@PurpCat Fully peer-to-peer/self-hosted approach on something like #I2P can be, as there are no unencrypted hops at any point in-between the source & destination.
#Clearnet#email is fucked, like most things on the clearnet.
@PurpCat@dalias@Obdurodon@jeff It did until very recently, but now trying to make one from #Tor has gotten inordinately difficult and presents a bootstrapping problem due to them trying asking for an existing email and blocking every single temporary mail service they know of.
@LunaFoxgirlVT If you've indeed taken that different path, then comparing yourself along the lines encouraged by the normal system is inevitably going to be depressing, since you're not living the kind of life it prescribes.
Programmer and Free Software proponent.Extra Pins:Software and Assumed Privilege, common problems: https://mastodon.top/@lispi314/111253066257920146Writing Privacy-preserving software & services 101: https://mastodon.top/@lispi314/110849018589421824#Kopimism #FreeSoftware #CommonLisp