> graf p moon and like a half dozen other instances have all had to act because their script is so retarded
If the same thing happened to other people, I am interested in that. I'm not sure if you're conflating two things (the MIT scraper and the Israeli scraper), because no one else got the Israeli scraper, I *think*, and I didn't have to act, I just watched that script run.
> A lot of people don't have historical ties to the communities in which they live, so the means for maintaining social order tends to shift towards what is most impersonal, public law.
There's also less incentive.
> That alone helps to maintain social order to a large extent
Yeah, prisoner's dilemma: what do you play if the game isn't iterated?
@graf@roboneko@Soy_Magnus@Humpleupagus@anonymous@Zergling_man Yeah, reasonable; even if someone has caused a problem or is likely to cause a problem, I try to wait until they actually do and it's actually impossible to get them to stop without doing something. Just here's a thing that causes a problem, I have to stop the problem, first choice is ask the person doing it to stop, that clearly failed, so I have to pick another option.
> a male doesnt have to overpower to not consent to something like that.
Well, plus, you clock a fat chick and then the cops ask you what happened and you say "Officer...it was self-defense, she was trying to sexually assault me." and you're getting hauled off, not her.
> why didn't I report it?
I think the presumption that the cops need to be involved, that some third party should have authority over everything or it's not real, is some kind of modern disease. "I cannot make you do what I want, so I will call the police and they will force you." So you've got New York making it illegal for a landlord to misgender you, insane shit like that. This whole "IF IT WAS REAL, THEN WHY DIDN'T YOU CALL THE POLICE" shit is a facet of that. This was an interesting read: http://righteousmind.com/where-microaggressions-really-come-from/ . The idea in the paper he's discussing (attached) is that societies' moral cultures fall into three categories: "A Culture of Honor. Honor is a kind of status attached to physical bravery and the unwillingness to be dominated by anyone.", "A Culture of Dignity. [...] Rather than honor, a status based primarily on public opinion, people are said to have dignity, a kind of inherent worth that cannot be alienated by others.", and finally "A Culture of Victimhood. [...] A culture of victimhood is one characterized by concern with status and sensitivity to slight combined with a heavy reliance on third parties. [...] Domination is the main form of deviance, and victimization a way of attracting sympathy, so rather than emphasize either their strength or inner worth, the aggrieved emphasize their oppression and social marginalization." The paper argues that we're a "dignity" culture and slipping into a "victimhood" culture with the upcoming generation, and that was written about ten years ago (it's noted that the mindset is prevalent in college campuses), so we're there, those people are all (chonologically) adults.
> From what I can tell, OPs position is it can't be rape if the man got hard. If so, how does she explain away many females experiencing rape orgasm?
No idea, she doesn't seem to wanna talk to people about it, but that is an interesting point. Either way, it should be obvious that anything every male does in his sleep every night is probably involuntary.
> Simply put, if the principle is that being physically aroused does not establish consent, then the same principle should apply to men.
You can't use logic on someone like that, I think.
@anonymous@Soy_Magnus@Humpleupagus@Zergling_man@roboneko He is mad that I repeatedly asked him to stop gorespamming random people and, after the nth time he ignored it, I wrote an MRF to prevent him from attaching files to posts. It seemed preferable to banning him, but he's apparently more mad than if I had banned him.
> Trying to join NATO doesn't make Russia any better or more reliable.
Well, the point, according to Putin, was that he wanted to demonstrate that NATO is an anti-Russian alliance, which NATO officially denies after the fall of the USSR. Russia's application was ignored with no explanation given.
The question was "what precisely are you trying to do, in concrete terms, that 'the Jews' are stopping you from doing?"
You filthy continentals don't understand anything but steel-toed boots, scourges, and scat porn. What do you think complaining over the internet to an American about Jews is going to get you, precisely? Do I control the borders of Europe? Do I care? You're talking to someone that thinks we nuked the wrong country.
Given that you are arguing with someone that isn't sympathetic to your plight and believes you to be a borderline-retarded serf and, given that if I changed my mind and wholeheartedly supported your stupid platform, I have no effect on European politics, you are wasting your time. This is your real problem, not Jews, not any of that: you waste your time and energy yelling at people that do not care and will not care and would not have a plan to help you even if they did care.
...Also probably you are one of those kraut feds from the BNBF tryna stir up "extremism". miscarriage.jpg
> Why ask questions... then protest and complain when answers are given?
I asked a question and you ignored the question and answered the question you wanted to answer.
> You asked for concrete points of argument.
No, I asked you what exactly, in concrete terms, you would like to do that "the Jews" are preventing you from doing. If I ask you what your concrete plans for lunch were, and you started babbling about wheat production, I'd tell you to fuck off. Just saying "fuck off, I'm not buying whatever you're selling" doesn't work on feds or agitprop dipshits, both of whom act as empty vessels for someone else's ideology.
> Address the other two points.
I didn't address any of those three points: I said I don't give a shit about that because it was not an answer and I have not ever cared about European politics. I didn't ask your political goals. Fuck politics, fuck you.
> Do you have to be reminded about everything you write? It was only one post up.
And "What the fuck are you talking about?" does not mean "I forgot that I wrote 'extremism' in scare-quotes". It meant your response does not appear related to the thing I said.
> You sure do write a lot of words that add nothing to the discussion.
Why, were you talking about Bitcoin? The discussion was about Bitcoin. Are you adding to that discussion, or just chiming in because you saw Senator "Wignat" Armstrong pop in to ramble about Jews and...hey, how many Nazis does it take to change a light bulb?
Ten. One of them might be able to do it, but none of them will do shit without nine friends backing them up.
BOFH of freespeechextremist.com, and former admin. The usual alt if FSE is down: @p@shitposter.club, and others. I am no longer the admin. FSE has no admins now. Welcome to the FSE Autonomous Zone.I'm not angry with you, I'm just disappointed.I am physically in Los Angeles but I exist in a permanent state of 3 a.m.I have dropped a bytebeat album, feel free to DM me for a download code or a link to a tarball: https://finitecell.bandcamp.com/album/villain . There is a chiptunes album there, too.Revolver is coming: https://blog.freespeechextremist.com/blog/revolver-kickoff.html