Notices by NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social), page 45

You can’t refuse. If the consequences of your regime are conquest, then the consequences of that conquest are also the consequences of your regime. So. Tell us about how great “National Socialism” worked out for those German people who were literally enslaved and starved after Nazi Germany was conquered. This is part of the story of “National Socialism” whether you approve or otherwise.

You’re going to have to account for all the degeneracy it caused post-conquest. Since you’re making an appeal to consequences we’re going to look at the consequences, including the forced labor (that’s like the opposite of vacations), deliberate withholding of food to prevent uprising, etc. Then there were all of the Soviet abuses that went on well past 1946, although the capitalist Americans were much more lenient.

Yes, this does have to be part of your analysis of how “National Socialism” worked out in the long run, since we’re doing a consequentialism here.

How did Hitler’s ideology benefit the German people? Give a long-term (50 year) analysis of the benefits of Nazism, starting in 1933 when Nazi Germany was founded, and continue through the rest of Germany’s occupied history until 1983.

They aren’t the same. You conflated three things into one. There are a lot of nation-states with many racial/ethnic categories, and no, not all of them are primarily White. China comes to mind. You’re playing word games like the Jews you so hate, and you know it.

Jews kvetch about fucking everything, it’s what they do. Jews kvetching says nothing about if something is a good idea or not.

By “national identity” do you mean “racial identity”? The two aren’t the same. Anyway, there’s nothing inherently wrong with racial identity, especially when you’re seeing antagony on the basis of race. But having a sense of “racial identity” is not the same as “national socialism.” So you’re conflating “national identity” with “racial identity,” which in turn you’re conflating with “national socialism.”

Are you doing this deliberately or are you unaware?

Not so well, they’re importing infinity niggers.

What was the net surplus/deficit of niggers until the end of Weimar Germany? Looks like we need another round of Weimar-tier communism by your logic. Nice red herring.

Your ideology is a failure and you need to give us a reason to take it seriously in spite of that. Here’s your opportunity to do so, but only after you admit that national soycialism is an even more spectacular failure than regular soycialism.

You will give your enemies exactly what they want if you cleave to past failures as though they are successes.

This is literally their argument for why the conquest of Nazi Germany doesn’t reflect on National Socialism. It’s literally a NO FAIR argument.

Bro tell me all about how great it was to be a German after Nazi Germany got conquered. And no, this topic doesn’t go away. Repelling foreign invaders is a FUNDAMENTAL, NON-NEGOTIABLE element of running a civilization that’s effective at anything. Your favorite example of “nationalism” got its shit pushed in right off the bat and no amount of coping makes this not the case.

PLEASE FLORIDA PASS THIS

That is basically the point, yes. The point of SSRIs is to take a people who are justifiably upset and then reduce them to docile nigger cattle

You stupid cunt, you started this thread with an attack on White Men. You absolutely deserve to be punished by them until they are satisfied you learned your place: beneath them. Then you should thank us for letting you live when we’re done humiliating you in front of the whole town.

RT:: https://mastodon.au/users/idealaw/statuses/109892228503617063