Conversation
Notices
-
>"The crew threw a molotov into the tank to avoid capture according to my sources"
>video footage of the Challenger 2 eating an ATGM
Someone tell LazerPig he's a stupid niggerfaggot that should be thrown down a well
RT: https://bae.st/objects/b8ebf3fe-4569-4e12-85a9-a0149b199343
-
Also, as Internet Nazis we of all people should know "the tanks are invulnerable except when they break down" is not an own.
-
Hmm, I found the idea of a tank crew having a Molotov cocktail with them in their tank and dropping it in the cockpit and the gasoline explosion destroying the tank so credible, too.
-
I don't understand why they're trying to cope to begin with, is the challenger 2 supposed to be missile-proof or something
perhaps people are upset the vaunted chobham armor is not living up to the hype
-
>is the Challenger 2 supposed to be missile proof or something
Literally yes this is what they thought
-
people didn't pay enough attention to iraq, even fighting third world pissants we still lost quite a few armored vehicles. turns out you just need to make the bombs big enough
-
@deprecated_ii @weaf @Terry People just can't wrap their heads around the fact that war with a peer adversary is way different than war against mostly unarmed third world pissants
-
yeah I mean who have the brits fought since 1945
all the current gen euro stuff is totally unproven
-
The brits were bragging about how it had "never experienced a loss at the hands of the enemy", which sounds cool until you realize they've only ever used it as a heavily armored cop car during police actions against underarmed goyim
-
Tank fans are super autistic, this whole war is basically like....if you had two wildly differenc schools of thought on train design, going head to head. Every blow carries the weight of a million online arguments.
Also brit media fellated the hell out of the tank, anyone having to see a couple of these articles every week is probably happy to see the myth shattered.
-
@Argyrus @Terry @deprecated_ii @weaf most people are retarded on warfare I’m glad to see these fart sniffers eat dirt.
-
point being, if yer going to make a claim you ought to have some facts to back it up. whatever point you want to make will fall flat with baseless conjecture.
-
You don't understand what I was getting at.. you want an exact figure like it has some point value or something. It is not video game.
-
but he asked a valid question so don't deflect especially after yer the one that brought up the claim. how many did they lose?
-
Dude idk how many they lost in the last 48 hours I was trying to make a point but I guess it just kinda flew over some heads. It's not a sports game.
-
I mean how many did they lose? Haven't seen new footage of lost Russian tanks in a while
-
My point is one gay challenger tank and every Vatnik has a boner all the sudden. It reminds me of how Muslims would act when they would blow up some shitty American apc in Afghanistan. What the fuck is lazerpig btw
-
That is not a kornet missile. That is one of like three lancets. And who gives a shit anyways do you want to see how many Russia has lost over the last 48 hours? Good job though on killing a tank. War is over I guess.
-
You made a direct comparison between the number of tanks lost by ukranians and russians in the last 48 hours. To then say "oh the actual number doesn't matter, I was making a different point" is how jews argue. I'm not letting it slide. You made a claim, back it up or withdraw it.
Weaf :jv::nv:
yockeypuck
d
Caek Islove 🍰 ❤️
Argyrus
Griffith
Heil_Honkler
🌧🌲Turkleton Pupptarr🌲🌧
Groomschild
All ０７６萌ＳＮＳ content and data are available under the