Notices by mist (ai@cawfee.club), page 5
-
mist (ai@cawfee.club)'s status on Friday, 26-May-2023 04:18:56 JST 
mist
@Tony @hidden @mia I've never seen one in real life! As a kid I spent a lotta time watching my friends play Pokemon on their Game Boy Color / Advance / SP. The first handheld I had was a Nintendo DS, and the first Pokemon game I actually got to play was Diamond. I had a bunch of Kirby games, too, but the most unique one was Kirby Canvas Curse. Kirby has no arms or legs and you have to draw ramps for him to travel on. I had nightmares about the final boss who was named Marx. Capitalist indoctrination started early for me smh smh -
mist (ai@cawfee.club)'s status on Friday, 26-May-2023 04:18:55 JST
mist
@Tony @hidden @mia That sounds like a great time :) I did play on the PS1 a lot even though I didn't have one. My afterschool daycare program had one and a friend had one too. Jak and Daxter was my favorite but I also liked Crash Bandicoot.
At some point I got a PS2 and my favorite there was Ratchet and Clank: Up Your Arsenal. Almost every time I visit home, I'll play through that game again. As a kid I was kinda into Courtney Gears ngl.
Later I got a Wii and the game I remember most was one I didn't even own: Super Mario Galaxy. It just felt really comfy to explore that darkened space station and see it gradually light up. I'm a fan of "small planet" photographs too (see pic).
I've never played a final fantasy game, but I feel like I have to at some point. They're classics after all. -
mist (ai@cawfee.club)'s status on Friday, 26-May-2023 04:18:51 JST
mist
@coolboymew @benis @hidden @coolboymew Didn't like it? :'( -
mist (ai@cawfee.club)'s status on Thursday, 25-May-2023 06:50:22 JST
mist
@ringo @hidden @Zerglingman @gav
Yeah, I'm pretty sure it's something like an average of word scores now.
Also, 199 seems to be the max possible score. Any higher and it goes back to saying "not enough data."
Here's my process for testing it. I generated 50 random easy words to get a baseline score, which was 98 IQ. Then I added a hard word and saw the score jump to somewhere between 113 and 115 IQ. Lastly, I kept adding hard words and saw how the score continues to increase:
grandiloquent: 114
+ execrable: 129
+ prevaricate: 142
+ adumbrate: 150
+ mellifluous: 157
+ impecunious: 164
+ inveterate: 170
+ maudlin: 176
+ mawkish: 182
+ coagulate: 189
+ resplendent: 195
+ intrepid: "not enough data"
- intrepid: 195 (again)
+ googly: 193
+ intrepid: 199
At the end, I suspected the "not enough data" was due to a score cap of 200 or 199, so I included "googly" to *decrease* the score, and then put "intrepid" back to increase it.
How does this compare to an average of word scores? Since including a hard word to the list of easy words makes the IQ score jump by around 15 points, the averaging formula suggests that a hard word is being assigned a score of around 15 * 50 = 750. In my final word list, I included 51 easy words and 12 hard words, so the average score would be:
(750 * 12 + 98 * 51) / (12 + 51) = 222.
It doesn't exactly agree with the actual IQ score of 199, but it's only 10% off.
The error message "Not enough data or not enough variance to estimate IQ" makes me wonder if they are also using the variance of the word scores in the formula. One way to test this would be to compare a list of 50 medium words with a list of 25 hard + 25 easy words. But I actually haven't found any words that are "medium" in the sense that they cause a jump of +7 or so when added to the 50 easy words. It seems that a word is either "easy" or "hard."
I also didn't find any words that cause a significant *decrease*. Ironically, I think it'd be much harder to create a (correctly spelled) word list that has a really low IQ. To decrease the score earlier, I tried "googly" because that word is used in elaera.
For reproducibility, here's my final word list, including the 50 easy words beginning with "death". The easy words were generated using https://randomwordgenerator.com/
resplendent
coagulate
mawkish
maudlin
inveterate
grandiloquent
execrable
prevaricate
adumbrate
mellifluous
impecunious
intrepid
googly
death
vague
glare
truck
date
cheat
shift
take
trade
sand
ear
shape
rent
up
craft
turn
quiet
know
coma
lid
grow
gun
paint
pace
cower
spell
teach
shy
X-ray
fine
coast
few
miner
wage
cope
coup
forum
ankle
save
aisle
huge
blame
raise
put
false
style
oven
axis
tray
thank -
mist (ai@cawfee.club)'s status on Wednesday, 24-May-2023 14:38:54 JST
mist
@hidden @icedquinn @ringo @Tony
When I googled for this website, the second result was a paper which suggests one possible 'algorithm': it might just compute the fraction of words in the text which are at 'collegiate' level according to SAT word lists. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1964/CS1.pdf -
mist (ai@cawfee.club)'s status on Wednesday, 24-May-2023 14:38:37 JST
mist
@hidden @ringo @icedquinn I think you're right. For example, if I randomly rearrange your sentence, the IQ score doesn't change.
Personally, I think ending with "Therefore," is a bold and striking innovation, on par with the famous usage of "Perchance" as interjection in the Mario essay. -
mist (ai@cawfee.club)'s status on Wednesday, 24-May-2023 14:37:46 JST
mist
@hidden @ringo Hm, it can't be a simple ratio either, because duplicating the advanced words doesn't change the score. -
mist (ai@cawfee.club)'s status on Wednesday, 24-May-2023 14:37:35 JST
mist
@hidden mfw reading this (I was wheezing by the end)
Also, I was 100% certain that 'mellifluous' would appear, and I only had to wait until the 4th paragraph! -
mist (ai@cawfee.club)'s status on Wednesday, 24-May-2023 14:37:17 JST
mist
@ringo @hidden indeed:
(this is https://www.writingtoiq.com/ ) -
mist (ai@cawfee.club)'s status on Wednesday, 24-May-2023 14:37:16 JST
mist
@hidden @ringo I fixed the typo 'entral' and added the e-accent to mélange and it boosted your IQ by 5 points: -
mist (ai@cawfee.club)'s status on Wednesday, 24-May-2023 14:37:15 JST
mist
@hidden @ringo Actually, this supports the idea that it's looking at a simple ratio of "advanced" words to all words. It doesn't seem to care that a few words are extremely advanced. -
mist (ai@cawfee.club)'s status on Wednesday, 24-May-2023 14:37:15 JST
mist
@hidden @ringo this website is a piece of shit -
mist (ai@cawfee.club)'s status on Wednesday, 24-May-2023 02:12:47 JST
mist
@MK2boogaloo @Ruusu @dieulast @Zerglingman @ins0mniak @mia @sysrq something like 160ms average iirc -
mist (ai@cawfee.club)'s status on Wednesday, 24-May-2023 02:11:59 JST
mist
@dieulast @ins0mniak @MK2boogaloo @Ruusu @Zerglingman @mia @sysrq
mfw I’ve seen this guy’s reaction time score :blobsweats: -
mist (ai@cawfee.club)'s status on Wednesday, 24-May-2023 01:40:12 JST
mist
@mia @MK2boogaloo @Zerglingman @sysrq most people are ghost people -
mist (ai@cawfee.club)'s status on Saturday, 20-May-2023 08:20:52 JST
mist
@Leaflord @hidden -
mist (ai@cawfee.club)'s status on Wednesday, 17-May-2023 07:21:26 JST
mist
@coolboymew @Bead @ooignignoktoo I just finished it. Can confirm it's very fun. Feels like Path of Exile except it's honest about what genre the game is (bullet hell rather than ARPG). -
mist (ai@cawfee.club)'s status on Tuesday, 16-May-2023 12:44:23 JST
mist
@hidden @MercurialBlack fedi is like a mind vaccine in so many ways -
mist (ai@cawfee.club)'s status on Tuesday, 16-May-2023 12:44:22 JST
mist
@hidden @MercurialBlack Yes. For example, here's my brain after being on fedi: -
mist (ai@cawfee.club)'s status on Tuesday, 16-May-2023 12:44:21 JST
mist
@hidden @MercurialBlack linux claims another victim
All ０７６萌ＳＮＳ content and data are available under the