@SpaceElf@parker@graf I checked, we don't have the offending JavaScript on file, so we're good. I will also update the CSP so as to block execution of scripts from the media directory.
@ShariVegas@SpaceElf@parker@graf Thanks I'll try that in a bit then. Otherwise I was thinking of something like deny all for js files in the uploads directory.
@PhenomX6@japananon@KitlerIs6@bot@Moon Game Boys at least are interactive, and not oriented around low-attention-span videos with weird sound effects thrown in.
@bot@PhenomX6@KitlerIs6 Doesn't help that children's videos are one of the biggest money makers. With even the most low-effort videos getting tens of millions of views.
@deprecated_ii@c A regression to the mean at least, since all the abysmal audible performances will get wiped out, as well as the stellar ones. I think it'll stagnate due to a lack of new material or voice actors from which to draw new performances & styles from.
But at the same time, I'd like to think that there will be a growing demand for in-person entertainment and stage plays, as people get saturated with AI based entertainment. I guess autotainment will be a thing, interactive, "choose your own adventure" type entertainment.
@deprecated_ii@c Ultimately though, I like it. There's plenty books I want to listen to, but are only available as low-quality voice-to-text robot renditions. But now I'm able to make decent renditions myself.
@goatmeal@meowski@KitlerIs6@bot@Moon@thatguyoverthere@ademan And again, the original point I was making, was in response to bot and kitler's assumption about when "[Bitcoin] developers start censoring politically incorrect people", using Ethereum as an example to build off of. My point being that Ethereum nodes aren't equivalent to Bitcoin nodes, given that Ethereum nodes handle all consensus, transaction relaying, and are generally more intensive to host, whereas those roles are more separate in Bitcoin.
Ethereum is constructed so that it is extremely difficult to run a node (which determine consensus), and the voting power attributed to each node depends on how much money you have. So major exchanges end up having most of the voting power.
Whereas with Bitcoin, you can run a node on a shitty laptop, so there's currently over 45k nodes live (which is why they keep transactions slow). And you have consensus/control divided up between miners, nodes, and devs, rather than just having all the power with a single entity (e.g., devs).
And you're talking about the 2010 inflation bug, which occurred extremely early in Bitcoin's history, on the first blockchain to ever exist. It was a perfectly reasonable move when it was a small project controlled by a couple people, rather than the globally distributed network it is now.
@goatmeal@meowski@KitlerIs6@bot@Moon@ademan A full (archival) ethereum node requires over 14 TB (https://etherscan.io/chartsync/chainarchive), requires $58K USD worth of ETH to be staked to the node, requires 100% uptime or you'll lose some of your stake, plus a decently powered server, which is a lot more intensive than running a Bitcoin node.
And the Bitcoin nodes do have some level of control, node operators choose what software to run and the miners have to abide by the rules laid out. Take for example the blocksize wars, in which Chinese miners wanted to increase the block size (to the detriment of the node operators).
Though the main differentiation between Bitcoin and Ethereum being that in the former case miners and node operators (transaction relaying) are separate entities, whereas in the latter they are a single entity.