“You know that he appeared in order to take away sins, and in him there is no sin.” (1 John 3:5 ESV)
“For our sake he made him to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God.” (2 Corinthians 5:21)
“For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but one who in every respect has been tempted as we are, yet without sin.” (Hebrews 4:15)
Christ was obedient to the Law of God even to the point of dying on the Cross (Philippians 2:8), in no way did He violate it but instead fulfilled it (Matthew 5:17, Romans 10:4).
Assuming your vague post is referring to Matthew 19:16-22, then both yourself, your wife, and any other person who told you it applies literally to the Christian today is missing the point.
The Rich Young Man couldn't bear to part with his wealth and so declined the invitation to follow Jesus. The point is that we ought not to be so attached to the wealth we have in this life that we miss eternal life.
A Christian is encouraged to share their wealth with the less fortunate but they are not forced to do so. Charity is not Communism.
Still a lot of votes to be tallied but media outlets are reporting that the Yes campaign has no path to victory. For those unaware, the Yes campaign needed both a majority of states to vote Yes and a majority of Australians to do so as well.
This is by no means the end of the Voice as it will likely be brought in through the backdoor via legislation. Also keep an eye out for government action against "mis-information".
@SrbijaStronk Alright, I'm going to be very autistic about this.
Neither Acts 7:43 nor Amos 5:26 mention Satan (as in the accuser Satan) by name, but instead refer to Rephan/Remphan (Kiyyun/Chiun in Amos but apparently the same idol) which may have been the name the Israelites used for the planet Saturn.
Which brings us back around to "yeah, it might say Rephan on the tin but it's Satan inside".