It’s not about butthurt, it’s just that protestants don’t always know their own history whereas Catholics and Vatican II sect folks tend to be more educated on it.
When it comes to the history of protestantism’s origins, Catholics, and to seem extent novus ordo folks as well, are often more well-educated than protestants.
There has never been an instance, at least available in any scientific literature, of someone getting sick from culturing bacteria and then administering them to an individual all alone in the absence of any other ingredients and then getting sick from that. Additionally, if germs or whatever are administered in an unnatural way, such as by being injected into someone, that doesn't prove that in nature that's how people get sick.
Perhaps because those bacteria are there to help heal the wound, sort of like how firefighters probably aren't gonna be hanging out at a house that isn't on fire.
Not if those things that are smaller than bacteria are isolated from everything else.
And who is to say that the bacteria which are present in a wound cannot and/or do not fulfill a similar function? The mere presence of those bacteria doesn't mean that those bacteria are what caused the problem.
Just because micro-organisms exist does not mean that they cause disease, and in fact it doesn't even suggest that they cause disease. It just means that they exist.
It's not. It has been starting to surface that the concept of germs causing disease originates from experiments without controls and outright scientific fraud. There's even a dude in Germany who is going to court over it, and actually another guy already went to court for it regarding the existence of the measles virus in particular and won: https://www.covid19reader.com/german-court-no-proof-that-measles-virus-exists/
But you believe the vaccine industry propaganda the vaccines prevent disease, even though there’s no evidence to support that. Because the folks who run the vaccine industry run the media and education system, this isn’t exactly well-known.
Yes, because it hasn’t been shown to be effective. I quote The Contagion Myth by Tom Cowan: “Pasteur believed that he could prevent rabies by vaccinating thevictims of dog bites. He created the rabies vaccine by taking saliva, blood,and part of the brain or spinal cord (usually the cerebrospinal fluid) from asuspected animal and injecting it into a living rabbit, then aging and dryingthe cells from the rabbit’s spinal cord so that it could be injected into humanbeings.His first patient, a badly bitten nine-year-old boy, received the vaccine—after a doctor had cauterized the wound—and recovered. Pasteurproclaimed his success—but others were not so lucky. A Dr. Charles BellTaylor, writing in a publication called National Review in July 1890, listedmany cases in which Pasteur’s patients died, whereas the dogs that hadbitten them remained healthy”
Viruses have never been proven to exist as anything distinct from exosomes, which are part of normal cellular function.
No seriously, it is. There was even a study or two that showed that it does get converted into DNA. It probably is hereditary. Why wouldn’t it be?
SARS-COV-2 has never been proven to exist, and Covid has no symptoms at all that even remotely distinguish it from the usual seasonal flu.
I would absolutely refuse such poison. Modern vaccines are no better than the ones from back in Pasteur’s day, and in fact if anything they’re worse because they have all sorts of nasty additives in them like heavy metals and stuff. No, a more accurate comparison would be a log of poo vs diarrhea.
All vaccines are poison, not just the Covid vaccines. The only difference is that with previous vaccines, at least those which made it to market, they weren’t genetic modifications and there was a more successful cover-up of all the adverse reactions to them and of their inefficacy.
Yes. If you actually look at the statistics, you can see that all the diseases were already on the decline or completely gone by the time a vaccine came out for it which means that the vaccine couldn’t possibly have been responsible for the end of the disease epidemic.
Sedevacantist theocratic monarchist and distributist. Agrees with the Fourteen Words but cannot agree with “Heil Hitler” due to knowing that Hitler was (((controlled opposition))). Despises mestizos and knows to not relax while around blacks. Feel free to message me.