Notices by houseoftolstoy@merovingian.club, page 3

@PapaPole @WashedOutGundamPilot >she needs to clean herself out with an enema bulb and thoroughly lube up

That is nature's way of saying that you should not be doing that. Having sex the way God intended does not require all that extra preparation. And all the bleeding, incontinence, and AIDS is also God sending you a message saying "Don't do it."

Yes, the AIDS part is more a concern for the homosexuals, which shows that it is a bad idea.

@DW2 I would disagree with the assessment that women think they will still be fertile into their 60s. Rather, the delusion is that they think the can just transition from a single woman "living in the moment" to finding a husband to marry and have kids with as easy as flipping a switch at any point in their lives. So they think nothing of waiting until their 30s to actually get serious about the idea of marriage.

Women should really get serious about marriage the moment they are fertile.

@WashedOutGundamPilot being tall and an avid gym goer is not a death sentence for women in the dating market. But being tatted up that much and having an abrasive personality certainly is. She should ask herself if the image of a bride includes tattoos all the way up to her hands.

@WashedOutGundamPilot Yeah, knowing all the same references is about as important to a relationship as what flavor of ice cream you both like. Which is to say, not at all important.

My wife and I have very different tastes for things we like to watch. Nothing wrong with that. She does not care that I do not watch many murder mysteries and I don't care that she is not into anime.

@WashedOutGundamPilot >jobs wages
Same projecting as always

>ridiculously good company

Now this is a point that needs addressing. Maybe they are good company for other WOMEN, but for men? Is that still the case?

Yes, the meme often goes that women are not worth conversing with, and that is true to a point. But I don't think it is just about capability or intelligence, but rather that women often never had to try being good at conversation in order for them to attract and keep men.

@WashedOutGundamPilot @siinclaiir @sjw @BowsacNoodle I do know someone in my family who is raising his own chickens. But he does it more as something he likes to do, as he most certainly does not make money on his eggs when he is giving many of them away. If you go into such a plan with the idea of making money, you are not going to do that unless you have a massive scale of operation. Which in that case, you have become a full time chicken farmer.

@WashedOutGundamPilot @nierenstein >It's so funny when easy women think having lots of sex makes them good at it.

I see projection at work on the women's part in cases like this. A woman may need a man to climb the learning curve to make her optimally satisfied, but for a man, it is quite easy for him to get pleasure out of sex, making "practice" for his sake mostly unnecessary. There might be some learning she can do to improve things, but it is really not all that critical.

@WashedOutGundamPilot @nierenstein And another thing, with the second post, a woman can get all the "practice" she needs with her husband. So the whore justification is not warranted. Rather, it is a post hoc rationalization in attempt to excuse her sleeping around.

Also, plenty of men are most likely not going to be receiving any benefit from her "experience," especially if she is unwilling to be enthusiastic in high enough frequency.

@WashedOutGundamPilot @PunishedD The inverse for a man is the type that gives women money on OnlyFans or Twitch chats. He is providing resources for a woman who is not reciprocating with sexual access.

When we go back to what works with marriage being the package that gives BOTH men and women what they want, things work better. And by marriage, I don't mean the hellscape that is modern marriage with current divorce laws and other crap. I mean "till death do us part" to the letter.

@WashedOutGundamPilot @PunishedD >never ONCE blaming the women’s selection of men who have no interest in them beyond their wet hole

This is the key. There is a reason we refer to women and men in their respective "gatekeeper" roles. Women are supposed to be more picky when it comes to sex precisely so that they do not get pumped and dumped. Unfortunately, many women forget that pickiness should be about if a man commits and not if he gives her the tingles.

@alex When you see no more commits, you start to wonder if the project DIED or if they are just taking a break. Because it just seems odd when SUDDENLY there are no more updates.

@BigTLarrity Unfortunately, many people still live in ignorance that it was a farce. I had a family member of mine bringing up "the new variant" and how they would probably have another booster and how "we just don't know how severe it will be."

Some people only get information from the "approved" outlets without realizing that there is a whole lot of valid information contrary to the bullshit propaganda.

@WashedOutGundamPilot For every guy who would say "YOU ARE PUSSY WHIPPED IF YOU WOULD CHOOSE THE DATE OVER MEETING WITH TATE!" I find it far more cringeworthy to chase the validation of another man, especially one such as Tate. Also it doubles as being mega gay to be chasing his validation too.

This has nothing to do with the quality of the date/woman, but rather that I have no desire to meet with Andrew Tate. He would probably try to scam me like he has scammed others.

@Pain66 >when they get fit

That is a big fat IF. Many fat women remain fat despite going to the gym because they only put a half hearted effort into exercising (e.g. elliptical machines which are hardly require any rigorous effort). Along with that, they often do not change their eating habits, which are the primary issue with their weight.

@ArdainianRight The idea that everything in the past was bad and awful and that we are "progressing" on the "correct path" so as long as we go against anything that was done in the past requires a very arrogant and naive mindset.

The normie masses cannot properly assess world events such as Russia invading Ukraine. Their perspective has been heavily warped by modern sensibilities and separation from any genuine conflict or strife that they do not understand what war means or why it happens.

Thinking in terms of "bad guys" and "good guys" in this war means you do not understand the nature of conflict. Everyone is acting in what they perceive to be their self interest. Nothing more.

This is regardless of who is right or wrong in this conflict. Russia (or at least Putin) sees taking regions like the Donbass as a part of its interests. Most likely, Russia will keep this territory.

However, the counter offensive narrative wants to suggest otherwise. Because the "good guys" are supposed to win, just like all the WWII movies and history lessons have told us. But what happens when we lose? This does not even cross the mind of those with a Ukraine flag in their profile.

These same people also do not understand the history of borders. Countries all got their territory from conquest and violence. Where many of the current borders exist are a result of some violence at some point, even if it is not in living memory.

So when Russia has been claiming more territory for themselves, this may be shocking to those who never thought about the history of every other border in the world. Borders also change, and often as a result of violence/war.

And this is where the prolonged period of relative peace has heavily skewed the perspective of those in the west. War is just something you see on a screen; either on the news or in a movie. And every time they see it, the US wins, because we are the best! And we are fighting for what is right (except when the media tells you otherwise).

But what if we are not as strong as we thought. Then what?

So many people are not ready for the "bad guys" to win. They do not realize that it is a very real possibility. Nor can they contemplate that Russia is not being uniquely evil for "invading a sovereign country." Territorial shifting is something that has happened many, many times. It is just not something that they ever thought would happen now. Not with the post WWII and post Cold War world.