> train a classifier of gore on fruits > launch it in production > harvest the reports of false negatives and false positives > fine-tune it on human feedback
That’s a great plan walter, that’s fucking ingenious if i understand it correctly. it’s a swiss fucking watch! 😀
Just "starcraft dataset", or "starcraft player actions dataset". There are already shitload of different datasets of different stuff, i suppose it wouldn't be hard to find one for your game if it's popular.
The only stuff i've had a hard time to find is anything nsfw, on the past job we tried to create an automatic filter of "hatefull content" and there were absolutely no labeled data of corpses and blood 🥺
I'm afraid you will need to create a new model for every game, because they all have different states and different actions to predict, hence different input-output layers. But i personally haven't experimented with this kind of models as i'm more of image generator person, so i have no strong opinion on this
> It's pretty trivial to make open worlds that don't suck already, with procedural generation.
I rather disagree, i've heard a lot of criticism of procedural openworlds from both gamers and game designers that they start to feel empty and repetitive pretty quickly. I won't say you cant create a procedural world that will be interesting, but it's not "trivial".
Like, making experience more or less important, or maybe changing the reward function in the middle of learning process (some dude from YT did just that when tried to make ai bot for trackmania)
Like for example gaining experience points and making it through a level the fastest way possible?
Yep! Just keep it in mind that the algorithm will maximize the reward function, so it is possible that it will figure out that just speedrunning without harvesting any experience is still the easiest way to do so. This thing is used to find the best strategies to maximize the reward in the first place, not to mimic certain behavior. If you wish to make it mimic certain human-player like behavior, i believe it’s also possible, but will require some tinkering.
Yeah, that's the point of reinforcement learning. You define some simple reward function, and the algorithm will learn how to maximize it. For example, the further player will walk through level without dying, the bigger the reward, and the algorithm will decide what to do with enemies, who to kill in first place and how, or maybe it will prefer to just speedrun the whole thing without murders.
Maybe the other reason is that i kinda don't like calling random people who don't literally rape children pedos just because they're weird and disgusting to you or you're disagree with their ideology. IMO "pedo" degraded into the same level of meaningless as "fascism", it only makes fighting real fascists and pedos harder :thinking:
So, you basically wish to know why i started this discussion with zerg?
Like i said, mention of sd and pedos in one line captured my attention, then i've read the post figured out that it isn't anything about prompters directly, but decided to post a reply anyway cause why not 🤷♀️ It's a social network and it's point is to talk with people about random stuff. If you (or him) find this interaction uncomfortable and/or unwanted, feel free to tell, i'm not pushy.
I'm looking for it cause i cleaned that shit from my timeline as it provides nothing good and only makes me feel sad and angry.
But if you wish a brief definition - this includes all the '''artists''' who hate image generators for copyright infringements and call it "not real art" despite they was okay with postmodernism for decades, normies who constantly whine about llms being "not real ai" and "corpo scam like nft" and so on.
I understand it, since transhumanist community now also have an ongoing culture war on ai safety 😀
There is a difference between criticizing someone's view on tech progress to achieve a better, more efficient and ethical tech progress and just a luddite psyop, and IMO it's kinda easy to separate one from other. And woke anti-ai bullshit isn't look like a criticism.
I suppose you dislike certain bad uses of biometrics by governments and banking system and not the tech and research itself, so let's better think who or what is the actual source of a problem
Well it’s a tool, it’s no more ugly that krita, photoshop, or blender, and there is no limit how you can use it.
Like, this thing was drawn nearly entirely by hand with a little help of sd and dalle3 as a ref generator, some painters use it as generator of sources for photobash and so on.