@sun@hakui It looks like the outgoing create activities with unlisted scope from SPW doesn't include the public namespace in the CC field, effectively making them private posts. The object data for such posts in my database does have the public namespace in CC, but the corresponding activity does not.
@sun Apparently, even my instance is affected by this bug since I updated from 2.6.3 to 2.8.0. So, this has nothing to do with SPW. In fact, feld-san already created this issue on Pleroma GitLab mentioning the exact same behavior: https://git.pleroma.social/pleroma/pleroma/-/issues/3323 @feld This doesn't seem to be the general Pleroma behavior, 2.6.3 included the correct value in the CC field for activities. Akkoma doesn't have this issue either. So this is probably a bug introduced after the 2.6.3 release. There's been some changes related to the handling of the CC field and some refactoring in the publisher.ex file, but I couldn't find the exact change/commit that could've caused it.
@wakarimasen@deadheat@lss@s@romin I think I've only had this issue with SPW, I can see unlisted posts of non-following users from other instances, but not from SPW.
@hakui Also verified this behavior on lain.com and tuusin.misono-ya.info, unlisted posts from SPW are not visible there, but unlisted posts from other instances are. So, this is definitely an issue with SPW. The object data for it does include the 'https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public' in the cc field, so I'm not sure what the issue is. CC @sun
@frogzone@Suiseiseki@mms@silverpill@nimda I still think that it's a better idea to let the browser render the play icon and the thumbnail from the video URL rather than trying to do it with CSS.
@frogzone@Suiseiseki@mms@silverpill@nimda >also to quote @silverpill elsewhere in this thread Yeah, and I also asked what the differences are in the handling of media from Pleroma/Mastadon and Peertube, but he did not answer. If Mitra already shows pictures/videos from Pleroma, then I don't think there needs to be any special handling for Peertube, unless there's a specific reason for it. >and its just about saying "its a video!" and "its external!" Well, it's a federated network, anything posted by a remote user is going to be external.
@silverpill@marty_bent@frogzone How does Mitra handle attachments from Pleroma and Mastadon? I don't think it'd be much different in the case of PeerTube.
@frogzone@marty_bent@silverpill Pleroma seems to add the video as a normal attachment, with the source URL pointing to the static video on the Peertube server. Maybe Mitra can do something similar.