Notices by Sir Pantangelini (sirpantangelini@noauthority.social)

@amerika
Libertarian populist.

I'm extremely anti-fascist/corporation

@Tony @IAMAL_PHARIUS

Private is government mandated by retards like Obama, so it's not capitalism, it's fascism.

@Tony
Yes, always better when the government can say you must take the pharma product or you will be shot.

@IAMAL_PHARIUS

@IAMAL_PHARIUS
I dont hate him. I hate retards who think universal health care and insurance are good things

@wjmaggos @threalist

Like russia russia russia....

@silas what did you do to Silas the boot licker?

@silas there is a difference between multi dimensional opinions and contradictory opinions.

Either way I'm all for the government sucks version of you

@cjd woe. Insurance to exist in a city in case you commit a crime... yea... that will totally make cities nicer.

Did you know the moon is flat

#ABraveNewIdiocracy

@chris ok, you can't say boobs and not share the enlarged boob pic. Fake news.

@chris

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13021237/Nines-Photoshop-fail-Australias-youngest-MP-lashes-network-breasts-look-larger-altered-outfit-stomach-promo-news-bulletin-one-proves-it.html

Sounds like there are stripper pics too.

I like this idea.

Make youtube ads fund the border obstacles course

@LALegault
@wjmaggos Wow. This is wildly misleading.

The JURY did not find trump guilty.
The JUDGE decreed that part true and told the JURY they must accept that it is true regardless of evidence which prove otherwise. The JURY is sitting on the civil part of the case.

This same tactic was used against Alex Jones.

Why can't people be honest about this shit.

@wjmaggos the same tactic was used in the aj trial.

I wish the best in seeing past your bias.. no interest in convincing you to like trump or aj. Just know the legal games being played.

@wjmaggos
This is incorrect.

It's even in that post which I can no longer see.

The judge instructed the jury that trump was guilty of assault and any evidence against this claim didn't matter. The suit was about damage, it was not whether or not e Jean carrol's story was real. He was never found guilty of assault, the trial was conducted assuming that was a fact. I'm not sure how else to explain this because it's such legal fuckery. Read the language in the lower portion of that image.

@wjmaggos
he was found civally liable for defamation in regards to a claim about assault that was decreed to have happened by the judge. The assault itself was never adjudicated

Hope that makes sense.

@11112011 @magicalthinking @thatguyoverthere

I like how he posts proof of an energy base that will often fail as proof of a good grid

Are the swiftie nudes better than dumb photoshop nudes? Or is it mostly just troll humor?

Feels like the perfect time for small business to stop paying estimated federal taxes and stop collecting federal withholding on their employees

@Max_Imum yes.
But my business isn't that big.

Need a few hundred of me to get that ball rolling well.