<<< You're comparing apples with oranges here.

>>> You say my problem is eating too much? Now you *have* to follow suit. Welcome to the club, enjoy solving the obesity problem.

When you say I'm comparing apples to oranges you probably mean that being fat is a personal choice while being a man isn't. However I'm not talking about the *source* of the problem, but against the attitude of forcing others to deal with any of your problems by making them suffer the exact same thing. This is against NAP.

"I guess you're misunderstanding spectacularly here."

I would say you don't know what your talking about, especially about the West. I will try to offer some insights you may have missed.

1) When parents are divorced, traditionally the father has to pay for child support

Officially it's all about the "best interests of the child". What no one is intent on doing is explaining why money in "child's interest" the kid has no right to spend or even know of.

2) In the west now that women are making money, now they decided that the mother needs to pay for child support

Women were making money in the past, they just resented doing so, and spun tales about abusive husbands refusing to support themselves. Now they have the gall to tell us they were prevented from being the breadwinner. On a technically legal side mothers could of been ordered to pay money to another legal guardian for a very long time.

It's another issue that men with "smarts" had nothing to do with, men always went with the dominant narrative.

3) And from what I understood, they're now abolishing child support all of the sudden.

This is nonsense, child support is taxable income and the state will always want you to pay more taxes. If money trumps gender for the landlords, it definitely does for the government thugs.