> Dunno, you started this debate.

"but also that there is no virus to begin with."

??

Since you mention that a lot, I got curious.

> ??

What difference does it make on whether "virus" is real or not?

I think denying the virology field is even more harmful because that means they can do whatever they want in the labs without any responsibilities, since virus never exists.

> Not sure how that relates to anything.

Semantics... The thing around LGBT is about calling "he/she/they" and the thing here is about naming "toxin/virus".

> I didn't make this ASSumption.

Yes. I said "you can make" not "you made". I was considering other possibilities.

> It's possible, I heard of people getting sick and positive, sick and negative, not sick and positive, and not sick and negative, so it's saying nothing.

Yes there are false positives/negatives, and those from PCR that can be faked (because who knows they are being honest). But for rapid kits they are done by myself. If they have faked it then they should give positives in a control environment. There could be false positives/negatives, but I did not find any clues that can tell that. Or maybe I didn't do enough tests.