> I don't think you understand the problem.

Either you or me, or both.

> I think I can assume we all know there is "something" causing illness?

yup.

> But what does this yes/no-virus war changes at all?

Dunno, you started this debate.

> What if we really debunked that "virus" does not exist in any means?

??

> Look at the LGBT people that got mad because someone used the wrong pronoun, but the genitals can describe the gender better objectively. The yes/no-virus is just like them.

Not sure how that relates to anything.

> It's good to challenge mainstream conversations, but then we can't accept everything just because it's "not mainstream".

Which is not what I was implying.

> You can assume I am either lying or mass-poisoned by my government through food or water

I didn't make this ASSumption.

> but I got sick too and positive with the rapid test

It's possible, I heard of people getting sick and positive, sick and negative, not sick and positive, and not sick and negative, so it's saying nothing.