Recently, I've been going down the "Free/Infinite energy suppression" rabbit hole. It seems like generating an infinite amount of energy for free is pretty easy, yet this knowledge is being suppressed by governments and corporations. Two of the most well known proponents of free/infinite energy, Stanley Meyer and Eugene Mallove were both apparently murdered, with Stanley being poisoned and Eugene being beaten to death in a supposed house robbery.
@xianc78@gameliberty.club I wholeheartedly believe these guys knew something worth keeping suppressed but I'm very skeptical about Free Energy and especially infinite... That said, you may want to check out this video about vacuum energy.
When it comes to the suppressed energy technology discussion there really are two major factors 1) Completely novel physics While I have little faith in academia, I wholeheartedly believe the MIC would take advantage of any and every new technique. I think it's not likely that there are technologies that are "game changers" without retooling many other things as well (thus introducing opportunity costs)
2) Scaling issues Most of the discussions I've seen about energy harvesting are by people who underestimate the amount of energy they actually need and just get excited about simple zero-cost energy that can't be scaled to more practical applications
I do believe that political decisions have influenced the direction and history of the energy sector for a long time, but my approach to these kinds of claims is I want to see it fully open source and replicated.
@gabriel It's possible that Eugene was killed for other reasons. He also apparently had concepts for interstellar travel that was way ahead of anything NASA has come up with. It kind of reminds me how Da Vinci basically had the concept of a helicopter during the Renaissance.
Anyway I decided to order a copy of Eugene Mallove's book as a Christmas present for my brother. He is currently majoring in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering and I want to expose him to something that might challenge what he is taught at school.
Magnetic energy seems to be the easiest. I actually had a similar idea, but I figured that there must be some reason why it can't be done, but it looks like I was wrong.
This generator in particular uses the potential energy from repealing magnets to generate free and unlimited electricity.
Now here is a free energy generator that is more similar to the one that I had in mind. It uses a wheel of magnets along with stationary magnets at just the right angle that it causes the wheel to spin indefinitely, thus generating unlimited electricity for free.
This is something so simple that an elementary schooler should be able to understand, yet the elites want to keep this hidden from us.
Here's a bigger one using only one stationary magnet with a disc of what seems to be more powerful magnets. The video claims that it can generate 220v of free electricity.
@jeremiah I don't know what that is. This is a perpetual motion machine (something that mainstream science says is impossible) being used as an electric generator. Supposedly, governments and corporations are trying to suppress this knowledge because it is a legitimate threat to the fossil fuel industry unlike the controlled opposition, climate scam.
@beardalaxy@jeremiah Or you can look into Stanley Meyer's water fuel cell, another perpetual motion machine that the government is trying to suppress. The inventor died from food poisoning, I really believe that he was murdered.
@xianc78 coercivity is when magnets depolarize over time when exposed to other magnetic fields.
This machine's principle operation is motion from opposed permanent magnets, which would be subject to depolarization (degradation) and thus could not be reasonably called "perpetual."
I would wonder if the energy such a device would release over time would be greater than the energy impounded in the manufacture of the magnets?
@jeremiah@xianc78 it might be kind of hard to isolate them as well if they were at a plant. I'd think that this is a cool little way to generate some power but it wouldn't be stable or efficient enough to work for a whole grid. Maybe you could make your own as a little backup or supplementary power source.
@xianc78 Sorry if I am answering twice, I thought I posted a reply and it seems to have never posted.
We already have free energy from the stars we do not have to do any work to get to stars constantly emit light to the world we live in
Light is emitted into our world. Plants convert light, water and carbon dioxide into sugar and oxygen. Humans eat the plants and consume oxygen and produce energy, water and carbon dioxide.
Because we are getting the light for free from an outside source the energy is free to us. If the universe is unlimited in volume and mass then places that are hit by light will do work from that light then heat up then cool down and emit light to other places which might result in in eternal perpetual motion.
@monsterislandcolonizer Check my other posts, I've showed some other ones that seem legit. The one using potential energy from magnets seems pretty cool and I don't know how that one could be faked.
@monsterislandcolonizer >A conspiracy by who? Fossil fuel companies. They don't want people to know that you can easily generate your own electricity. It's the same reason why Stanley Meyer and Eugene Mallove were murdered.
@xianc78 A conspiracy by who? The companies making electric motors? The thing you've shown is an extremely basic and weak electric motor. It was like stop number 2 before people landed on DC motors with a rotating armature.
Here is a documentary on Stanley Meyer and his water fuel cell. Supposedly, his patents left a few details out which is why nobody has been able to replicate it.
Just thinking about what the world would be like if Stanley Meyer wasn't murdered and his invention caught on.
* No more worrying about rising gas prices or oil shortages * No more wars over oil * Nations would be less reliant on other nations for oil * Secession would be easier (dependency on resources such as oil is one of the many reasons why it almost never happens)
But of course anyone who poses a legitimate threat to an industry that basically has control of the government would be murdered. Hopefully, someone will replicate his invention and it will actually catch on.