every day in public, some different random person says die nigger faggot. totally not harassment according to dark fedi.
Conversation
Notices
-
william.maggos (wjmaggos@liberal.city)'s status on Sunday, 22-Oct-2023 06:47:40 JST william.maggos -
Moon (moon@shitposter.club)'s status on Sunday, 22-Oct-2023 06:47:39 JST Moon @wjmaggos @p @amerika @jeremiah the majority is absolutely incapable of rendering fair judgment on this, people love to drag someone's ass for saying something wrong, totally not harassment. -
Jezza™@threads.com (Official) (jeremiah@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Monday, 23-Oct-2023 04:56:41 JST Jezza™@threads.com (Official) @wjmaggos @amerika @Moon @p there's a contradiction in your statement.
> what i want is more people here interacting with people they don't agree with
so try it. don't put conditions on it that turn off half the group up front. If the other half are turned off by the lack of conditions, then they don't want to interact with people they don't agree with and the purpose is futile.
-
sim@shitposter.club's status on Monday, 23-Oct-2023 04:56:41 JST sim @jeremiah @wjmaggos @amerika @Moon @p
I second this.
I appreciate being polite when it comes to interactions but this doesn't always mean that I get to interact with people that don't agree with me. Some people are set in their ways and will other you even if you are polite simply for holding different viewpoints. You are the out-group. If you want to be a part of the in-group then you have to meet all these confusing conditions first and even if you do then your past can be used against you. You can't win this when conditions are put in place.
Besides that, why is it just one side that is expected to change?
Don't be an arsehole or else we'll block the instance you are on, forcing you to be isolated from your instance or your entire instance isolated from us. And arsehole is arbitrary and depends on what we think being an arsehole is so you have to jump through hoops to meet this requirement to interact with this instance and at our pace so you have to always be ready or else we assume bad faith. And you aren't allowed to object while we behave like arseholes and hold this against you. It's okay when we are abusive, lie about you and behave like arseholes with these conditions but not you. You have to change for us, you can't expect us to adapt to you. -
william.maggos (wjmaggos@liberal.city)'s status on Monday, 23-Oct-2023 04:56:42 JST william.maggos I'm not worried about people who feel compelled to follow such commands. what I want is more people here interacting with people they don't agree with. Mean shit directed at people keeps that from happening. call me selfish but I think what I want is also good for society. kinda done.
-
≠ (amerika@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Monday, 23-Oct-2023 04:56:43 JST ≠ Here is the Michelle Carter problem:
1. People can say KILL YOURSELF, and therefore some will.
2. If people obey this command, there will be a loss of life.The only way to protect civilization is to have people tough enough to response to KILL YOURSELF with disinterest instead of outrage or compliance.
The same is true of ethnic slurs.
We cannot have people so fragile they suicide because someone said #KillYourselfNiggerFaggot.
-
≠ (amerika@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Monday, 23-Oct-2023 04:57:19 JST ≠ @sim @p @wjmaggos @jeremiah @Moon
The pressure on instances to remove controversial users is a slippery slope with many chilling effects.
This needs to be handled on the user level, by the users.
Wild West, but with full image upload.
-