A lot of kids should not be in this part of the web. See; that furry who had an amber alert issued on him after grooming and kidnapping a 13 year old over VRC/Roblox.
@PhenomX6@Hoss i dont disagree, but the standard 13 years old disclaimer is a decades old legal standard boilerplate statement and has nothing to do with Culture War
Yep. But I think that they should be more explicit and put in "18+ only" or some shit and openly make it policy to ban anyone under 18, like many sites do.
Most sites in this part of the web have a "no underage" rule not even solely for legal reasons but because underage kids will do stupid shit.
ever read up on purplekecleon when she was straight up saying "yeah I want kids to see Sex Positive porn" and how she got outed linking her NSFW tumblr to a dA comic that began on the SFW side of the site knowingly so kids would click on it? and isn't it crazy how her husband who said "CP should be legal" is on the fedi too?
It has nothing to do with style guides. The reason for the 13 yo requirement is that it's the minimum age at which COPPA does not apply. In other words, they're inviting children onto their explicitly adult oriented instance so long as they can avoid prosecution.
@PhenomX6@bot@Hoss i want to make it very clear that im not defending them and that I am actually anti porn in all cases for children and adults i just know that sometimes this stuff is copy pasted directly from style guides from the 90s
The instance owner is a schizo who blocks all pleroma instances with that nginx rule btw and Eevee made a page a while back about why PHP sucks. Which means if someone says php sucks, say you're not a pedophile.