Conversation
Notices
-
touch fluffy tail (Heroic) :verified: (fluffy@fsebugoutzone.org)'s status on Thursday, 18-Jul-2024 04:43:50 JST touch fluffy tail (Heroic) :verified: Anyone have experience with blacked out FOI docs?
I was glancing at the "Pre-September 11, 2001 Trading Review" today and noticed that the part explaining the newsletter's motivation was omitted.
In practice, for what reasons do things end up omitted from FOI documents?
cc @p
image.png
image.png- † top dog :pedomustdie: likes this.
-
pistolero (p@fsebugoutzone.org)'s status on Thursday, 18-Jul-2024 04:44:01 JST pistolero @r000t @istvan @fluffy "Catch-22 says that we don't have to tell you what Catch-22 says." -
touch fluffy tail (Heroic) :verified: (fluffy@fsebugoutzone.org)'s status on Thursday, 18-Jul-2024 04:44:01 JST touch fluffy tail (Heroic) :verified: @p @r000t @istvan
>Do you have PDFs or just those PNGs?
here's the PDF
9-11-sec-report.pdf -
istván (istvan@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 18-Jul-2024 04:44:02 JST istván @fluffy @p Redactions are made when information within a document is exempt from the scope of FOIA.
There are nine broad exemptions.
1. Classified information.
2. Information about Internal personnel rules and practices of the agency.
3. Information blocked from disclosure by another law.
4. Trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is confidential.
5. Privileged communications within or between agencies.
6. Information that would invade a private citizen’s privacy.
7. Information for law enforcement purposes that could fuck up legal proceedings, constitute an invasion of privacy, reveal a confidential source, reveal techniques or practices of law enforcement, or put someone in danger.
8. ANY information about the supervision of financial institutions.
9. Geological information about wells.
Anything they can tie to one of these they can strike out. -
Himbo Techbro (r000t@ligma.pro)'s status on Thursday, 18-Jul-2024 04:44:02 JST Himbo Techbro @istvan @fluffy @p #7 realistically lets them strike out literally anything they want about any criminal case, period.
-
pistolero (p@fsebugoutzone.org)'s status on Thursday, 18-Jul-2024 04:44:25 JST pistolero @fluffy @istvan @r000t Looks like it was physically blacked out and then scanned.
> We have not developed any evidence suggesting that those who had advance knowledge of the September 11 attacks traded on the basis of that information.
> those who had advance knowledge of the September 11 attacks
> those who had advance knowledge of the September 11 attacks
> those who had advance knowledge of the September 11 attacks
:globalistlocated:† top dog :pedomustdie: likes this.