Notices by nicholas_saunders (nicholas_saunders@mastodon.social)

@arstechnica is that library.lol or different?

@arstechnica the energy costs are prohibitive. It can only be used #insitu afaik.

#space #spacemining #postscarcity

@arstechnica yessss

@nixCraft the beauty of this AI is that it plagiarizes and steals, and never cited attributions.

Plus, it's real fucking good at spotting plagiarism and art fraud.

"The smarter villain sells a service."

#monetization

@arstechnica I don't mind the Tubi ads so much, just a bit repetitive.

@arstechnica #cognitivedissonance

@eff no.

This is anthropology.

But, yes, it's creepy.

@RD4Anarchy @thetechtutor @aral no, dude, you just explained to me that the Al Aqsa Flood was as a direct result of Israel's actions.

@RD4Anarchy @thetechtutor @aral if the al aqsa flood was a direct result of Israel's actions then Hamas has no culpability. And, no agency.

@RD4Anarchy @thetechtutor @aral

Where you write "...face the truth of what Israel is doing," you don't specify what military action would've been legal following the #AlAqsaFlood operation.

@RD4Anarchy @thetechtutor @aral

Where you write that "focusing specifically on a hypothetical response to that particular event alone ignores the long history of Israel's occupation...," you've both dodged the moral question of:

What military action following the #AlAqsaFlood would've met with your personally high moral standards?

As well as setting the context as not just as Arafat has sought, but what now South Africa would seek.

@RD4Anarchy @thetechtutor @aral so absolutely no response as to what military action following the #alaqsaflood operation would've been either legal or moral, then.

@RD4Anarchy @thetechtutor @aral

"Morally I reject states so there is nothing a state could do militarily that I would consider moral."

What you've actually advocated for was no military response to the #AlAqsaFlood operation with this statement.

And, yet, you've in no way, ever, said that the Al Aqsa Flood itself was immoral.

I would point out that #hamas is a state actor, but you've already explained that legalities hold no interest for you.

@RD4Anarchy @thetechtutor @aral I asked you one question. One.

You declined to answer on either a moral or legal basis.

Here is the question:

What military action would've been legally or morally acceptable to your high standards following the #AlAqsaFlood operation?

You've dodged this question.

It's a very reasonable question. Your inability to form a coherent reply isn't terribly interesting.

No nations. No borders. That's not an answer but a dodge.

@RD4Anarchy @thetechtutor @aral

"It was also a direct consequence of actions by the state of Israel."

If so, then #hamas has no moral responsibility here at all. I find your philosophy interesting.

@RD4Anarchy @thetechtutor @aral

https://mastodon.social/@nicholas_saunders/111868592884257168

@RD4Anarchy @thetechtutor @aral so you've ceded the argument, rd, and just want to point links to others making points for you.

@RD4Anarchy @thetechtutor @aral make it about you? Not at all.

You've simply chosen to not answer my basic question -- so you have, to that extent, made it about yourself.

On the other hand, you throw insults my way, instead of, ya know, answering that real simple question which you've dodged countless times now.

@aral @tek @aiefel when you're ready to discuss the tunnels under hospitals let me know.

@itsfoss to keep track of multiple partners?