An archeologist accidentally gets transported back in time to the advanced (stone-working & writing) civilization he was studying by one of their artifacts.
Firstly; It's important to separate out Free Software charity from non-corporate work. Assuming there's only corporate and charity works... is incorrect. The vast majority of FS work is individual and small business needs. Not charity.
Large organisations can damage an open source project through sheer presence, very easily. The thumbs on the scale are *very large* and *very clumsy*
Better the giants stay away then try and be helpful
Yeah, I have my strategies on the DRM front you might appreciate: I seek out & promote alternative entertainment! I'm finding lots of audioshows I adore...
I can't see any possibility for the publishers to change, but the need for them outside of marketting has been diminishing. I can do my small part in filling that need.
@alcinnz Based on my 30 years of keen observation, those who succumb to that temptation are substantially more likely to change their definition of 'good' to include themselves and their employer than they are to shift their employer's culture for the better. I strongly believe that public corporations are inherently irredeemable - https://davelane.nz/megacorps 2/2 @msw@downey@skyfaller
@lightweight I am not disagreeing here, employment can shape opinions & I do not trust the strategy of change-from-within.
Maybe it won't come across as if you are inferring immorality if you focus on the point of disagreement.
For example I once had an argument with a chrome dev. That disagreement was unusually self-evident: He thought browsers needed to be complex as complex as they currently are, I don't. That's where I focused, & yes it didn't get me anywhere.
@BenCollver@skyfaller@downey My stance: It is useful to take a hardline stance against driving to climate protests to avoid those protests getting too comfortable requiring cars.
But at the same time I can imagine cases where driving a car to some climate action is the most beneficial thing to do for the environment! Though I would encourage car-sharing to minimize the harm.
@BenCollver@skyfaller@downey My stance: It is useful to take a hardline stance against driving to climate protests to avoid those protests getting too comfortable requiring cars.
But at the same time I can imagine cases where driving a car to some climate action is the most beneficial thing to do for the environment.
@msw I think that accepting resources from corporations who are well known to actively undermine #Copyleft is unfortunately not a neutral act. It signals an implicit acceptance of those donors' actions, and an obligation from the OSI to give them the benefit of the doubt. We need to convince democratic gov'ts to fund #FOSS as digital critical infrastructure, and shun corporations and their donations entirely. A smart gov't would recognise that. Few, if any, are. @alcinnz@downey@skyfaller
@lightweight@downey@skyfaller I appreciate the dev work they do! But I can't defend them as an organization or the effect that (especially their marketing team) has on their product. Or the cringey blogposts they write.
They have a vital role I want them to continue filling!
@skyfaller@downey I know how you feel, climate advocates do like being out in nature. Which often requires cars. Usually though I get by with an electric scooter! Or car-sharing's an option.
A browser developer posting mostly about how free software projects work, and occasionally about climate change.Though I do enjoy german board games given an opponent.Pronouns: he/him#noindex