Notices by cjd (cjd@pkteerium.xyz), page 36
-
If you define progress by the government and the law library becoming bigger and bigger without end, then yes, I want regression.
I want them to have just enough time to pass laws against such things as murder, robbery, and fraud, but no time whatsoever to dream up conceptions like professional licenses, food and drug regulations, and seatbelt laws.
-
"Problem" ?
-
If it were up to me, I'd make a constitutional amendment that every law expires after 10 years, and all new laws need to be read, IN FULL, in the congressional chamber, and nobody can vote YES on them unless they sit through the entire reading and don't fall asleep the whole time.
-
Well no, that's a good thing.
This kind of sloppiness with the meanings of words from widely published journalists is indicative of civilizational decline, so when you tell me it is not a real article that means there's just a tiny bit less decline.
-
GPT-grade journos using the word "hate" when the correct term is "condescension".
No realistic person HATES people for not changing the batteries in their smoke alarm, that's silly and ridiculous.
This is condescension. The so-called "far right" is expressing PRIDE in themselves for changing the batteries in their smoke detectors like good citizens (or taking them down entirely, as the case may be), and they look down upon people who don't.
-
This seems like a very childish perspective of evil, like how a person would describe evil if they'd never learned about war, famine, genocide, etc.
-
No, I'm calling YOU childish because we live in a world of:
* Wars engineered on false pretenses
* Genocide & holocaust
* Engineered famine / holodomor
* Human & child trafficking & slavery
And yet your conception of EVIL is a guy standing on a podium making fun of a crippled journalist.
-
You are devaluing the meaning of the word Evil.
Mocking somebody on stage might be rude, it might be in bad taste, it might be offensive, but it's not evil.
When you begin instinctively reaching for the most extreme word you can find to describe everything you don't like, your words cease to mean anything at all.
This is endemic of the period we are living in, modern language is collapsing down into Nazis, and Literally Hitler, and Worst Thing Ever. As art becomes paint splatters, food becomes slop and academia becomes GPT-generated drivel.
-
Personally I would support pretty much *anyone* who is not of the Clinton/Bush/Obama power structure, be they Trump, DeSantis, RFK, Ramaswamy, or anyone else like them.
Whoever they are, there's very little chance that they'll be able to be MORE harmful than a Party Man because as outsiders they don't have the connections/power.
Which one should be supported is simply a practical matter of whose most likely to win.
P.S. Don't get me wrong, I don't LIKE any of them.
-
This is the kind of mental gymnastics which people do when they write in Mickey Mouse and then walk away smiling and fancying themselves as "at least not part of the problem".
The Government You Deserve.
-
So by writing in somebody who is obviously not going to win, you essentially choose to abstain. A LOT of people do this which is why voter turnout is so low.
If you're not willing to make an analysis of which is the lesser of two evils, then in general you will end up with the greater evil.
In the words of Joseph de Maistre, "In a democracy people get the leaders they deserve." and a lot of what has befallen America over the past 50 years is indeed well deserved.
-
It is very important, because he and they are in political power competition. If you believe in ethical good/evil, then one of those sides must be less evil than the other and the ethical thing to do is to back that side.
Now maybe your position is that they're all so deeply compromised that you don't really have an opinion about who is worse - and that's a position I can respect.
But when you SPECIFICALLY single out Trump, I can't help but think that you are in fact pro-Clinton/Bush oligarchy so I'm going to make you explain how you square your ethics with their crimes against humanity.
-
Flash election: Donald Trump vs. George W. Bush.
Who are you voting for ?
-
I think that to see him as a *particularly* bad guy requires a lot of ignorance to what The Oligarchy does.
They and their little "free trade agreements" turned vast swaths of America into an unlivable hell-scape the likes of which are not seen anywhere else in the world. Then you have 9/11, patriot act, and Bush's forever wars and dumping of heroin on the people, in addition to destroying America's credibility in the world by wanton embrace of torture.
I don't know how you measure "evil" but if it's by the amount of human suffering created, 1000 Trumps couldn't even hold a candle to what the Clinton or Bush families have been capable of.
-
> an evil, racist man who lies through his teeth and does illegal things at every turn
Did you deduce that from first principles, or did you fall asleep with the TV on and wake up knowing it ?
-
> is j6
The reason he's in court is because The Oligarchy doesn't like him. It's been that way since 2016.
Whether you side with him or with them is kind of a personal decision, and who is really in the right or in the wrong is probably something we mere mortals will never know.
But lets not be silly and pretend like all these different court cases are being brought by completely different and unrelated people for entirely different reasons.
-
> Unrelated arrest in 2022
-
Hope he's right, guy is useless.
-
Welp, guess that's it for the stock market
⚰️ 💀 ☠️
-
China has a really easy game to play here: Finance blatant and obvious election fraud on the left, then supply shitloads of weapons to the right. The way to beat the US and dethrone the dollar is to push the US into a civil war.
Most people aren't smart enough to resist this tactic.
cjd
Give the funny.
- Tags
-
- ActivityPub
- Remote Profile
Statistics
- User ID
- 2252
- Member since
- 20 Dec 2022
- Notices
- 1043
- Daily average
- 1
cjd
All ０７６萌ＳＮＳ content and data are available under the