Notices by cjd (cjd@pkteerium.xyz), page 35
-
Shapiro, after retweeting that post goes on to essentially acknowledge the fact.
> Boo hoo, we can't do anything because the Senate and Whitehouse are controlled by Democrats
Yes you can, you can shut it down.
-
Stop passing US government funding bills, i.e. take away Biden's allowance.
-
Yes, they had that choice back in the summer and they voted to keep funding the machine. Uniparty politicians play hard when they're defending the uniparty but throw the game when they're supposed to defend their constituents.
-
Impeachment without control of the senate is the equivalent of a strongly worded letter. The only move GOP has is to shutter the govt.
-
Hmm, poison ?
💉 💀
-
I'm not convinced there really is any "freedom side", it's all just mafias battling it out with other mafias.
-
Germxns gonna Germxn
-
You're gonna go to their investor meeting and complain that they aren't efficient enough? 😂
-
I think the Japanese conception of prison is a pretty good one. It's safe, you're treated like a human being, and the food is not industrial slop. But it's like years of military training and work to beat the criminal instincts out of you and make you into an upstanding citizen.
-
My face when people start implying that heartless to try to stop the largest organized system of theft & enslavement in history.
-
How about just chaos and nothing gets done?
Imagine the whole beast defunding itself and putting an end to every stupid weird little "business" that should not exist and would not exist in a free market and obviously only exists because it sits somewhere downstream of some government agency somewhere.
-
LPNH is still going strong
-
Introducing bills while the House is shut down is like saying you can kick someone's ass when they're not around.
-
Alberta is rejecting Canadian theftsation 👀
-
I don't mean the length of one law, I mean the length of all statutes in the law library.
Of course common law and jurisprudence is another matter, and should be, as the settlement of disputes between parties is should be able to consider the history of thinking on the topic (though I'd argue the judge ought to be required to recite their opinion in court, lest those too become GPT-generated monstrosities filling entire harddrives.)
-
LOL which one of you did this?
-
The problem is that there is no longer any hard limit on how much law can be created. Before the advent of word processing, things had to at least be typed up, there was some kind of a limit. Now there's almost no limit.
Imagine GPT powered lawyers. Do you know what GPT lawyers will do? They'll write laws. And we will be very soon end up with hundreds of GIGABYTES of not-limited-bys and with-regard-to-section-Bs.
Every so often someone in congress hires a DC print shop to run a half dozen high speed printers and print off a bill in a couple of hours so they can throw the paper down on the table in protest of it. But everyone else just says "aye" because money talks and they're on the dole.
And just like that the number of federal crimes on the books overflows the 32 bit integer and the government makes it's way closer and closer to its inevitable collapse.
-
There has to be a hard limit, otherwise it will spiral out of control as it already is.
How many words of law *should* exist, in your opinion?
-
Nice news: CISA, the Surgeon General, the White House, the FBI and the CDC are all forbidden by court injunction from having any communication with social media companies related to the purpose of censorship.
-
OFFICIALLY DENIED 😂
cjd
Give the funny.
- Tags
-
- ActivityPub
- Remote Profile
Statistics
- User ID
- 2252
- Member since
- 20 Dec 2022
- Notices
- 1043
- Daily average
- 1
cjd
All ０７６萌ＳＮＳ content and data are available under the