Notices by Qadse Sanur Qut ibn Quaadibz :catsader: (nerthos@shitposter.world), page 7
-
Qadse Sanur Qut ibn Quaadibz :catsader: (nerthos@shitposter.world)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Nov-2024 02:09:43 JST Qadse Sanur Qut ibn Quaadibz :catsader: @MK2boogaloo Honestly not a bad deal. -
Qadse Sanur Qut ibn Quaadibz :catsader: (nerthos@shitposter.world)'s status on Friday, 08-Nov-2024 22:34:51 JST Qadse Sanur Qut ibn Quaadibz :catsader: @matrix @LukeAlmighty @Mr_NutterButter @jeremiah That fucking balding lol -
Qadse Sanur Qut ibn Quaadibz :catsader: (nerthos@shitposter.world)'s status on Friday, 08-Nov-2024 22:34:47 JST Qadse Sanur Qut ibn Quaadibz :catsader: @matrix A country founded by prostitutes, with politics defined by prostitutes. -
Qadse Sanur Qut ibn Quaadibz :catsader: (nerthos@shitposter.world)'s status on Friday, 08-Nov-2024 21:46:35 JST Qadse Sanur Qut ibn Quaadibz :catsader: @MK2boogaloo @vitalis Most rifle engagements were trench to trench, at a distance where breastplates and helms did ok. Within the trenches handguns and smgs as well as melee weapons were favoured because it's not easy to maneuver a rifle in there other than as a bayonet platform. Thus, the armor was somewhat functional. -
Qadse Sanur Qut ibn Quaadibz :catsader: (nerthos@shitposter.world)'s status on Friday, 08-Nov-2024 09:14:17 JST Qadse Sanur Qut ibn Quaadibz :catsader: @MK2boogaloo @vitalis WWI breastplates could stop all handgun rounds minus maybe 9mm at close combat distance and were decent against rifles at long distances. Armor was never bad against guns, just expensive to outfit conscripts. -
Qadse Sanur Qut ibn Quaadibz :catsader: (nerthos@shitposter.world)'s status on Thursday, 07-Nov-2024 02:55:05 JST Qadse Sanur Qut ibn Quaadibz :catsader: @mangeurdenuage @asa You can have duels and similar kinds of violence without collateral damage.