Do I need a different word then? You both seem to be using the word technology specifically to mean the material artifacts produced whereas I was using the word in a more abstract sense of the human ability to produce such artifacts.
Either way, are you saying technology is a bad thing that should be eliminated? It doesn't seem like it, I think you're both still just making the same point I was making: that technology (in the abstract sense, not talking about already existing artifacts) can be good or bad depending on how it is implemented. I do not think the same is true of #capitalism, which is the only point I was making, as a counterpoint to the suggestion that capitalism is just a tool that has to be managed properly.