Before quoting, I have to say that the way I read your comment, you seem to think in terms of you can only be either "rich as in multi trilionaire" or "poor as in being completely homeless wearing 30 year old clothing begging for food" with no middle ground possible.
Maybe you're not implying that, but it reads as such, which of course creates this whole concept of "money good vs money evil, not taking a position is literally impossible".

> In any means, I don't think you can get rich with just those money.

And neither was I implying that that's the case.

> That's why I said it's if you are rich you will say money is not evil and vice versa.

Not really, if you're rich you don't say "money is not evil", you just don't make a statement on whether it's evil or not, probably because you have better things to do in life than to worry about that.

> That is bizarre... why will they want to write that?

Government indoctrination, I mean public schooling, would be my guess.
No idea what's going on in their heads though...

> They clearly know that others can't easily get rich with just hardworking.

In my opinion, you don't necessarily need to get rich, as long as you can get around independently and thus not becoming a burden to all the rest of wherever you live, that's good enough.
As I already said, I'm neither rich nor poor, I do make ends meet without financial help from others (I do invoice customers, but I mean in the sense of getting paid for doing nothing).

> Are we even living in the same world lol?

Well I hope so.

And not going to respond to the last question.