Conversation
Notices
-
@mushroom_soup JK Rowling's only real purpose in life is to make trannies seethe with rage. Her retarded tryhard books are incidental to this.
-
I think they are what they are: decent children’s fantasy. Gaiman never had such broad reach. Her sourcing from all of mythology is something final fantasy started doing in the 80s.
-
@TrevorGoodchild Rowling makes use of the female superpower - instinctive understanding of personality - to engineer a plot twist very similar to what Rand pulls off in Atlas Shrugged.
When she finally explains Snape's backstory it all snaps into focus like the end of a Mamet play. Of course it's all in service of an incredibly vapid postwar morality play, with Voldemort the hypocritical mongrel wizardist and his corrupt aristocratic followers plotting normie genocide.
-
@judgedread She really does hit the normie sweet spot, with the pseudo-Latin wizard incantations and the clever kitchen-sink appropriation of worldwide mythologic creatures into an amalgam. The latter made me suspect a long time ago that Rowling had taken inspiration from if not completely ripped off Neil Gaiman, as he also loves to pull that trick in his fantasy worlds ('American Gods', 'The Sandman')
Turns out I was right
theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2015/03/the-other-harry-potter-that-never-was/387364/