@Pawlicker@icedquinn In my experience shucking the drives and connecting them directly to SATA is faster than connecting them over USB3. Though that might've been a quirk with a drive I used, it always spun down after inactivity and then took a shitton of time to access the data again; I used to have a script that dd's a small file and removes it every 10 seconds before eventually getting another SATA card and connecting it internally instead.
@Pawlicker USB-C ain't that slow :blobfoxfloofowo: i used an older usbc for years and it was fine. although my expectations are "hold files it would be neat to still have, but i need more space for something more relevant"
@icedquinn@Pawlicker@susie@7666 That was Thunderbolt which exposes PCIe bus. Even before that you could attach GPUs to chinkpads with ExpressCard (another hotpluggable PCIe slot type) via adapter, it's fun.
@icedquinn@7666@Pawlicker@mint I used eSATA a lot on my X5650 (X58) system around 2012-2019. Back when motherboards had tons of connectors and costed only pennies. I was then dumbfounded that my new motherboard didn't have a single eSATA port, only one PCIe port and costed twice the amount of that old motherboard in 2020 (also no three channel memory, but I guess that isn't important in DDR4 era).
"Thankfully" my HDD-dock also came with USB3 so I didn't have to buy anything new to do backups.
But for "real" archiving, the only certified method of doing it is to burn archiving quality CD-R discs with maximum of 20 years self life before replicating the data to a new CD. Nope, not even DVDs or Blurays ever got certified for archival due to them being too dense mediums or some such. HDD RAIDs and tapes are also deemed too dangerous, even though those are what everyone uses these days lol