> Seriously, all the jewish stuff I can think of is junk or someone else does better;
>tavor - the aug is better and bullpups kinda suck anyways
>uzi - the mack11 and variants are better and easier/cheaper to produce
>desert eagle - a hand cannon that uses a m16 type bolt, you'd be better off with a 44mag revolver or some kind of wildcat cartridge on another platform
>galil - it's a heavy ass ak in 5.56, you're better off with either AK variant OR an m4/m16
This is the most based gun post I have ever seen on fedi
@GabeLakmann@Lover@RadixVerum Not off the top of my head. But there’s a reason those kikes in Israel sent all their dusty rusted ass bullpups to Ukraine.
it makes me fucking SICK that people want to clone IDF trash.
I hate arfcom because of shit like that and they'll also ban if you even hint at anything "anti-semitic" even if it is true and you're not being obviously inflammatory about it.
I’ve surfed there since I was a kid, so I’ve gotten to see the zeitgeist change flavors over and over again. I get you the same guys paying $350 for a worn out sling were the ones paying $60 for “glacier guards” to replace their stock colt handguards with
@GabeLakmann@Evil_Bender@Lover@RadixVerum@RedKaiser I spent so long just DYING because I was constantly looking at stuff I couldn’t buy. So many good deals just gone, because I wasn’t old enough to buy them or didn’t have the money.
I was always in tune to the trends, so when I used to see “old” stuff like non-quad railed ARs tossed in the pawn shop pile I’d die knowing I’d never see them that cheap again. Thanks to youtube and instagram everyone knows what’s cool, so the days of “eww….who wants that? So old fashioned, what’re you gonna do with a revolver?” are long in the rearview.
I remember shitty K98’s going for $120 because “russian captures are dogshit”, I remember $800 lugers because they weren’t parts matched, Remember $500 CMP garands from WWII lots, Buy1-get-1 Mosins for $100, and Colt sporters for a princely sum of $600
Once I got money I tried to do what I could but you can’t snag ‘em all
I bet those were the first batches of WASRs in the late 90s/early 2000s or so right?
They had fitment issues and canted sights but worked well for the most part.
The newer ones run just as good as anything else. AKOU has one with 10,000+ rounds that still shoots like 1-2moa and battlefield vegas uses them too I think.
@Evil_Bender@GabeLakmann@Lover@RadixVerum@RedKaiser I tell friends to just ignore all that shit and start asking friends, family, and neighbors if anyone has a Garand “they don’t shoot much anymore”. When someone tells you he nabbed one back in the day, play up how freakin expensive ammo is and you’re off to the races.
Next best thing. Granted, CMP is shipping sweet Harringtons from the korean war era last I heard. They’re gorgeous, arguably better than WWII but you lose the green park. Less sexy
I need to go find those threads again because I lost the bookmarks.
I don't think I had anything on their shit list either.
There was A LOT of great information in those threads. In fact, I'd say they're about the best thing going right now if you want first hand info on what to buy and when to start expecting failures/breakage/etc.
@RupertvonRipp@Evil_Bender@GabeLakmann@Lover@RadixVerum@RedKaiser Depends on the grade. I think specials are relatively bare, they’re parts guns. The ones that take a LOT of work are the “correct” grade and whatever else is original. They’re taken right out of the 50’s crates that they got packed in years ago. I don’t think I’ve ever held one totally clean yet
@GabeLakmann@Evil_Bender@Lover@RadixVerum@RedKaiser No way. It’s just a diff. charm. Ideally you’ll buy both. H&R’s are this lovely dark tone, partly from the cosmo but I think the wood is a little diff since they had more time to age it back then. I think they’ll be appreciated more by our kids.
Today most see them as the lesser simply because they’re not WWII but to me they’re the peak, they’re not rushed, they’re clean, and they just have the faint air of a civilian hunting rifle.
@GabeLakmann@Evil_Bender@Lover@RadixVerum@RedKaiser@RupertvonRipp I just use a heat gun and spend time outside. I hate leaving the oven door open and grilling it, but heat is the best way to bring it to the surface. Otherwise it’s a sponge, it’s embedded in the wood and you’ll always feel nasty to the touch.
Just a roll of shit paper towels, a heat gun, a drink, and some sawhorses and you got yourself a saturday outside
That makes sense. If they've been messed with in the arsenal to bring up to spec of whatever then they'd likely have less cosmoline.
I used boiling water to get rid of it and some other cleaning stuff.
If you have a heated pressure washer then that is probably the way to clean metal stuff, although it probably isn't a great idea to use it on wood. At least with any pressure anyways.
@GabeLakmann@Evil_Bender@Lover@RadixVerum@RedKaiser FWIW you’ll probably never see one like that. The few that were brought back were always reconditioned and factory overhauled to get rid of any real character. It’s ironic, because collectors hate them for being “non-original” when they see a mishmash of barrel, bolt, trigger dates and drawing numbers but there’s a higher chance it saw actual service.
Anything correct likely stayed in the states all along. In war’s end they just tossed everything in a pile and MAYBE brought them back, then left some poor guy to look at whatever needed changing and disassemble them
They're both nice and while it'd be cool to have a WW2 garand, I'd still be super happy with a Korean era garand and, to be honest, I'd almost prefer if it didn't have any notches in the stock or anything.
@WashedOutGundamPilot@GabeLakmann@Evil_Bender@Lover@RadixVerum@RedKaiser Jesus apparently this was in the pacific. All those boys in europe got the fany fucking new garands these fucks had to use their granpappies rifle from the first war. That would fucking suck in the pacific. They really were just getting white men killed
It’s been a while for me, but as I recall it’s a combo of institutional momentum and the marines saw themselves as RIFLEMAN. They didn’t trust a semi for duty, they saw it as an army project and preferred the “trustworthy” bolt action instead. Not to mention the 1903A1 is a damn slick gun, in more than a few ways handier than the M1. You lack firepower, but it’s lighter, and the sighting system was exactly what the USMC loved. IIRC the lack of weight up front was preferred because it made bayonet combat easier too.
Keep in mind the target shooting/competition mindset informed a LOT of combat arms back then. That lasted all the way ‘til the 90’s, even, with many of the additions to the M16A2 being more or less built around killing it at the qualification range.
That’s why they like to talk about how the marines would squirrel away M1’s whenever they could, until they achieved widespread issue in the middle of the war.
@GabeLakmann@Boomerman@Evil_Bender@Lover@RadixVerum@RedKaiser And the Corps wasn’t necessarily using old shitty 1903s. I don’t think any of the original Mark Is even survived in government service at that time. They had a cost-reduced, simplified A3 spec they issued to churn them out even faster.
There were real problems with the Garand when it first came out, the gas system had to be completely redesigned (Gas trap to plug, now super rare), so the marines were still somewhat in the right to just equip the boys with a known quantity. Since most of the ‘03s left over from WWI (which I doubt were all that many, and after the depression they likely hadn’t ordered too many) were quickly issued for training back home, most of these GI’s got the improved, latest & greatest A3.
Has better combat-worthy sights, longer sight radius, more wood to protect the hands in bayonet work, and a MUCH better stock shape with a pistol grip for added security.
@GabeLakmann@Evil_Bender@Lover@RadixVerum@RedKaiser@WashedOutGundamPilot Apparently a good chunk of the forces there were aussie militia men. That maybe why so many of them have old shit. Apparently macarthur also fucked up and didnt supply it very well. The kikes dont talk about the pacific because muh holocaust is the point youre supposed to get. Also that theatre was about as shit of a war as you could fight and we fucking dominated japan. Reminding whitey that he can fuck up whoever he wants when he feels like it isba cat they need to keep in the bag.
@Boomerman@GabeLakmann@Evil_Bender@Lover@RadixVerum@RedKaiser It’s not retarded though. That’s just the modern fetish for individual rifleman power talking. Even today, with all this vaunted rifleman firepower, it’s still the MG making the kills, isn’t it?
Everyone issued bolts back then. I haven’t read my gun library for a while but I think they were surprised that changing over to the M1 really didn’t change things as much as they thought, other than burning through a LOT more ammo.
@johnbudd1350@Boomerman@GabeLakmann@Evil_Bender@Lover@RadixVerum@RedKaiser Some of it’s good, but the first generation of the 1903 was very silly. It’s got a ton of tiny, milled knobs to adjust windage in all these directions, which is wonderful at peacetime, but not at all robust enough for extended combat, nor is it suited for being made quickly.
In war, most of these peacetime designs saw lots of simplifications as engineers broke each operation down to its elements and cut time wherever they could. Compare the first one to the second. The latter is protected and simplified, not to mention mounted about a foot further back, so the longer sight radius enhances accuracy even more looking through the peep
Yeah there were stories of guys sending jap skulls back to their sweet hearts lol. Probably the biggest racial conflict America was ever involved in aside from the Indian wars.
@Boomerman@GabeLakmann@Evil_Bender@Lover@RadixVerum@RedKaiser@WashedOutGundamPilot Libtards boasting proudly about their grabdpas being the first ANTIFA, meanwhile the pacific theater was a literal race war between Whites and Japanese that reached subhuman levels of depravity unseen in Europe. Many marines would collect the ears of defeated japs. Meanwhile, captured German prisoners were treated more fondly by White american soldiers than the black servicemen were
@RupertvonRipp@Boomerman@GabeLakmann@Evil_Bender@Lover@RadixVerum@RedKaiser Conserve Ammo is absolutely vital for the marines, too. They’re dependent on easy target transport ships, and more than a few times ended up stranded when a jap sub sunk their supply. Once they established a bigger comfort margin in ensuring their logistics worked, and the M1 secured a track record of success after a year or two of hard use, then they made the switch.
Everything’s a tradeoff. I certainly wouldn’t want a Gas trap garand in 1942, in the pacific. Then you have nothing when it corrodes to shit after a month
@Boomerman@johnbudd1350@GabeLakmann@Evil_Bender@Lover@RadixVerum@RedKaiser But the average american draftee even had a way, WAY higher standard of shooting talent. A whole lot of those boys survived through the great depression hunting for survival throughout the country. It’s not like it is today.
@johnbudd1350@WashedOutGundamPilot@GabeLakmann@Evil_Bender@Lover@RadixVerum@RedKaiser Im the modern age "accuracy" can mean a lot. Does an infantry rifle need to shoot sub moa at 100 yards? Not really its just gotta hit whatever some goober is pointing at. Lots of troops are conscripted so you need a rifle any retard can pick up and use for potentially years.
@GabeLakmann@Evil_Bender@Lover@RadixVerum@Boomerman@RedKaiser I can’t remember the battles, but there are at least 2 occasions where the marines landed, established a beachhead, and then watched their navy buddies retreat with their supply shifts aflame.
We simply couldn’t guarantee the supply lines for double the ammunition expenditure during the early phase in the war, if not triple. Burning through a clip in the M1 goes quick, and you just keep shooting under pressure. The 1903 forces a pause in between, that greatly slows fire rate, true, but chances are the guy isn’t really hitting anything anyways, judging from the rounds-per-kill metrics
@jay_k@Boomerman@GabeLakmann@Evil_Bender@Lover@RadixVerum@RedKaiser Dig around w/ the CMP, too. They have a lot of active people into this stuff. May be worth reading a bit on them too on the off chance you have an early one. They could blow up because the heat treatment at the time was done by eye, instead of by temperature (IIRC?)
Pawn shops, stores, it doesn’t matter, they all look at gunbroker and decide a turkish mauser stock is definitely $400 because it looks dark and has a bunch of dents in it. I hate it, the hobby got so moneyed so quickly.
I think 50 years from now people will balk at the idea of guys undoing the work of depression-era hunters sporterizing GI guns. I know yours will be something 70/80s, so probably not applicable, but if the wood was cut down and hand-cut for patterns up front, that’s just as charming as a GI rifle. There’s still millions of government-spec 1903s, but there may only be 1 of the gun that kept a family of 9 warm through the winter of ‘33.
At least hold on to whatever you take off. I foresee an era where people will start leaning into sporterized guns in a collector bent, and well-made work may end up quite valuable.
Give me a second and I'll look some up. For the barrel search "criterion barrels" if it has been cut down and for the stock, maybe try numerich or brownells?
A lot of those brutal soviet stories were because of the nonWhites they used too. Mongols and other such subjects. Though, out of all the regimes at the time the European soviets were definitely the most traumatized by their own governments.
If their grandpas were Nazis then they actually DID beat the first antifa.
You're right about the German POWs. As well as they were treated by the USA, the Germans actually treated the British and American POWs even better than they got treated. The Germans were the most honorable in the war but the Americans and British were pretty decent too.
After all, they had so much in common and were essentially related. It's hard NOT to find common ground and see them as a respectable enemy just doing the same thing you're doing but for their home team.
Whereas the marines were hearing stories of guys being tortured, flayed, starved, and all sorts of gruesome shit. The japs definitely had an idea of what no holds barred meant. Anything Americans did in the pacific was nothing compared to what the Japanese did to POWs.
He was a Philly gunsmith who otok Winchester high-wall receivers and rebarreled them with winchester barrels after cleaning off all the original markings. He did pretty good euro walnut stocks and excellent Lyman sights to match. People called him the “poor man’s Griffin & Howe”, which is actually high praise for the era. Value 5 years ago was from $1600-2500, so today likely a good deal more.
Kinda painful to imagine how many good, beautiful pieces of work are being “returned” to look just like any other POS 1903 when they’re far, far rarer
But if it’s a bubba job from 1985 then rock on, just give ‘er a look over and make sure you don’t magically have something of real enduring quality. Gun nerds are dumb, they’ll toss excellent stuff thinking they’re upgrading to the next, better thing….only to kick themselves later because they gave up something wonderful. (I.e. the guys who traded in Colt Snakes for Glocks in the 90’s)
I carry it because I've been to war with it and have experience with the platform. But I will always love the 5.56, and why do you need to improve it? People still get wrecked by it body armor or not, if it ain't broke don't fix it!
@jay_k@GabeLakmann@Evil_Bender@Lover@RadixVerum@Boomerman@RedKaiser Here’s a griffon built on a model 98. Just imagine being the ghost of the guy who bought this thing, knowing the price, who left it in the family and some boomer ends up throwing cheap, mismatched K98 furniture on it.
There’s something funny about that to me. It’s an inversion of the normal “nooooooo don’t change it every milsurp gun is a holy relic don’t tough it” attitude everyone has now. Originality is valuable no matter what it is, I’d rather have an original sporter than a mismatched mutt milspec rifle, and vice versa.
Then again, they’re expensive because they’re popular, not really because they’re all that rare. It’s easy to get a little too invested in junk guns when they’re just old. I don’t care when guys make tanker garands, because it just makes mine go up in value anyway. They made like 7 million of them anyways.
@WashedOutGundamPilot@Lover@Evil_Bender@GabeLakmann@RadixVerum@RedKaiser@johnbudd1350 Had a retard buddy take me to a range that wasnt his. We were asked not to shoot the steel with rifles. Easy enough. So my retard buddy hits a plate with a 7.62x39 and it doesnt do shit. Tell him we shouldnt shoot it anymore. Grabs my AR and puts like 10 rounds into it. Yell at him. Tells me its cool bro 7.62 did nothing what was wimpy 5.56 gonna do. Well they damn near blew through the plate. Owner got super pissed.
@jay_k@Boomerman@GabeLakmann@Evil_Bender@Lover@RadixVerum@RedKaiser It’s all good, buddy. Always happy to talk gun autism about this stuff. Makes me happy bringing others into the vortex. If you ever have a shot of the stock I’d be curious, I haven’t seen that many sporter 1903 and I’m not sure what the norm is for them
Those are the sporterized ones I was talking about that AREN'T fudd trash.
Larry Potterfield or maybe Brownells showed one sometime for some reason or another and it was very nice. I think larry was hand fitting a recoil pad to it maybe?
@jay_k@GabeLakmann@Evil_Bender@Lover@RadixVerum@Boomerman@RedKaiser I got in the habit from granddad, where everything gets individually bagged with a note card of the gun, the serial, when it was taken off, and why. It’s come in handy over time, we tend to forget and before you know it you’re gonna throw away a barrel band worth $150 to the right guy. But you gotta be able to identify what it is.
If nothing else your kids will like it someday. It’s very cool being able to see the writing and see “Removed from 121416 on 1/4/92. Changed bolt to period-correct lot number. Fits all models”
I think there’s definitely a place for a .30 cal but I don’t think 5.56 is as useless as the army and other shills make it out to be. I like the conspiracy theory that they just don’t want civilians getting hands on armor piercers for the eventual civil situations in the future.
@GabeLakmann@Evil_Bender@Lover@RadixVerum@Boomerman@RedKaiser@jay_k Of all the things we own, guns are some of the greatest heirlooms. Everything I do tends to have that in mind, 100, 200 years from now someone will be looking at it feeling the same way I do when he hefts it and wonders what it’s seen
5.45 isn't bad. It's the commie equivalent of 5.56 and works fairly well. Ammo availability not being an issue would cause me to choose it over the 7.62 if I could only have on rifle and that rifle were an AK.
@WashedOutGundamPilot@GabeLakmann@Evil_Bender@Lover@RadixVerum@Boomerman@RedKaiser Oh Lord no. I respect vintage, enough to not have my gun pride offended that you're looking out for it. Going to go original furniture, but keep scope & mount. There's zero tacticool advantage from having a fucking thumbhole imo. Just want all the original parts in my inventory.
Fudd shit is when it’s both cheap AND poorly done, like when you see someone drill in a 1/2 lb block of PIC rail to fit a shitty chinese scope after dremeling off the Mark I sights for a “scout” scope.
It’s a shame about the stock, it’s actually handsome, as far as aftermarket ones go. Maybe it’s gonna be cool looking with the wood on it. I’ve never found it in myself to go for the long, skinny period scopes but they are cool looking.