Conversation

Notices

1. Based Bagel (basedbagel@merovingian.club)'s status on Tuesday, 16-Jan-2024 15:21:06 JST Based Bagel

   Unequivocal proof the south did not give a rat's ass about "states rights" and was trying to protect their slave $$.

   1. The Dred Scott decision, widely favored in the South, aimed to infringe on the Northern STATES RIGHTS from limiting slavery within their own borders.

   2. In the Bleeding Kansas conflict, proslavery forces tried to force the legalization of slavery in Lecompton. This revealed a broader pro-Southern commitment to slavery, often disregarding the will of the people.

   1/?

   • shortstories@merovingian.club's status on Tuesday, 16-Jan-2024 15:21:03 JST shortstories

     in reply to

     @basedbagel

     I do not believe we can know civil war history because the history after Covid 19 was claimed to exist came from the news and was made up stuff

     I have seen fake history created live in real life so now I doubt all of history

     Machismo likes this.
   • shortstories@merovingian.club's status on Tuesday, 16-Jan-2024 15:21:04 JST shortstories

     in reply to

     @basedbagel

     What if the reason there are so many similarities between Abraham Lincoln and John F Kennedy is because both were written by the same fiction script writers who tried to pretend it was non fiction and neither actually existed

     https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lincoln%E2%80%93Kennedy_coincidences_urban_legend

     Lincoln–Kennedy coincidences urban legend

   • Based Bagel (basedbagel@merovingian.club)'s status on Tuesday, 16-Jan-2024 15:21:05 JST Based Bagel

     in reply to

     3. Southerners kept trying to force Northern states to help them capture runaway slaves, violating the Northern STATES RIGHTS.

     Later on a Fugitive Slave law forced Northerners to help catch slaves at the south's request. They didn't care about the North's states rights

     Southerners who claim to be bations of freedom were against the Kansas-Nebraska act of 1854 with allowed the states RIGHT to choose if they wanted slavery or not.

     It was never about freedom, it was ALWAYS about slave $$.

     2/2

   • Machismo (zerglingman@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Tuesday, 16-Jan-2024 15:21:52 JST Machismo

     in reply to

     • shortstories
     @shortstories @basedbagel Gentlemen, I have come to the unfortunate conclusion that we have fought on the wrong side of this war.
     
     Also reminder that the Titanic was most likely sunk deliberately.
   • Based Bagel (basedbagel@merovingian.club)'s status on Wednesday, 17-Jan-2024 04:11:19 JST Based Bagel

     in reply to

     • Machismo
     • shortstories

     @Zerglingman @shortstories

     >we have fought on the wrong side of this war.

     Yes and no.

     IMO there is no "wrong" or right side there are just powerful people with different interests and sadly the freedom lovers got the short end of the stick.

     But we can still salvage this personally. Check out the book "How I found freedom in an unfree world" for ideas. (Skip the ancap stuff)

     Machismo likes this.
   • shortstories@merovingian.club's status on Wednesday, 17-Jan-2024 05:32:05 JST shortstories

     in reply to

     @basedbagel

     It would be very easy to hqve a lot of people write fictional accounts about a man

     Machismo likes this.
   • Based Bagel (basedbagel@merovingian.club)'s status on Wednesday, 17-Jan-2024 05:32:06 JST Based Bagel

     in reply to

     • shortstories

     @shortstories I understand there was alot of covid propaganda but Lincoln DEFINITELY existed.

     Do have any idea how hard that would be to get so many people to make false accounts of the same fictional man?

     Doubting everything is as unreasonable as being a normie believing everything.