Conversation

Notices

1. aevisia (aevisia@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Monday, 15-Jan-2024 02:21:49 JST aevisia

   in reply to

   • John C Dvorak
   • NEETzsche
   • Adam Curry [Texas]
   • wyliesau
   • F-U-WAR.COM
   • Sir Nedwood

   @NEETzsche
   It is possible to see that anti-white speech is also racist and hateful while also not feeling inclined to stoop to their levels and participate in the same hate speech. Two wrongs don't make a right. What you're arguing in favor of is making everything worse, and actually making them feel justified and right in their assumptions about you, because being hatefully racist out of spite is proving them right.
   @ned @adam @Johncdvorak @SirRoundedByMyPrivilege @wyliesau

   • NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Monday, 15-Jan-2024 02:21:50 JST NEETzsche

     • John C Dvorak
     • Adam Curry [Texas]
     • wyliesau
     • F-U-WAR.COM
     • Sir Nedwood
     >hate speech
     
     Justified in the current climate. Honestly, given how one-sided the "racism is bad" idea has been applied, wwhere the "unless it's against Whites" caveat has been used ruthlessly, Whites have license to do away with the idea entirely and implement a brutal White supremacist regime. Rehabilitating "racism is bad" as an idea as more than just an anti-White grift will be difficult, and is going to require rather extreme measures. If you want an example of what I'm thinking of, look up "Denazification," where in Ally-occupied Germany they did things like make it illegal for people with a history of Nazism to hold any non-menial position, they were forced to labor, and had their calorie intake restricted to about 1,000/day to prevent uprising. Think that, except targeting anti-White wokesters. That's what rehabilitation of "racism is bad" is going to take.