Conversation
Notices
-
Reminder that porn stars and "sexual performers" are guilty of child sex abuse. They put out this content knowing full well that kids are going to watch it, get addicted, and become customers for life.
These "performers" should be treated the same way and with the same attitude as child rapists.
RT: https://wolfgirl.bar/objects/83942318-4f0a-405e-a761-abeb35ee4a4b
-
@SuperLutheran @SirAttlich @mkultra Absolutely nothing you’ve said or posted says starring in porn is the legal standard of sexual abuse. This is an absurd shell game and you’re simply trying to move away from your original statement as hard as you can because it’s indefensible. Arguing in this bad faith with your own side is absurd.
-
@SuperLutheran @SirAttlich @mkultra It’s simply not child abuse and it’s like you’re trying to make the worst possible argument for something you believe in to see what you can get away with.
I admire the chutzpah but this will never be the legal standard because it leads to abuse.
-
@Griffith @SirAttlich @mkultra It absolutely is and you are flat wrong.
professionals.childhood.org.au/prosody/2016/07/melinda-tankard-reist/
-
@Griffith @SirAttlich @mkultra Me: "let's ban porn and punish the people involved with it, because ultimately it's child abuse."
Libertarian thinkers: "Oh wow so why not go ALL THE WAY and ban MAKING CHILDREN UNCOMFORTABLE, HUH??2!?"
Not a serious counterargument.
-
@SirAttlich @mkultra Yeah, so let me be clear about something.
My children's wellbeing is more important to me than your free speech. If you're going to lump pornography with "free speech" (which is ridiculous), then I'm A-OK with everyone's mouths being stapled shut if it means my kids aren't sexually abused.
-
@SuperLutheran @SirAttlich @mkultra absurdity on the level of no one can drive a car because they might hit a deer and your kid will see it by the side of the road.
-
@SuperLutheran @mkultra Ain't gonna simp over porn stars but my dude you really, REALLY don't want to go down that path cuz it opens up a fucking can of worms regarding anything whose demographic are adults but are accidenfally consumed by children as well.
-
@SirAttlich @mkultra You say that like it's a bad thing.
My children's wellbeing is more important than your entertainment, simple as.
-
@SuperLutheran @mkultra It's not about "children vs entertainment" you stupid nigger, it's the fact that you are literally asking for government intervention for "morality" reasons.
Need I show you how this can also VERY MUCH APPLY to freedom of speech aka hate speech laws?
Not saying that porn is good, far fucking from it, but please do think a bit how some reasons can be used to justify downright tyranical laws?
Slippery slope ain't a fallacy, it's a fact for a reason. Why do ya think we have naked gay degenerates today at Pride parades around 10 year olds who twerk?
-
@Griffith @SirAttlich @mkultra If whatever legal standard you're referring to says it's perfectly fine to knowingly produce material that's going to screw kids up and then disseminate it all over the place so kids have easy access to it, then you need a new legal standard. The recent interviews with porn execs talking about how they want 12 year olds getting into tranny material is more than enough. They are knowingly putting kids into harm.
SuperLutheran (Festive half)
Griffith
sirattlich
All ０７６萌ＳＮＳ content and data are available under the