Conversation

Notices

1.  (mint@ryona.agency)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Dec-2023 23:53:49 JST 
   GLEASONATED
   Screenshot_20231212_175018.png
   • † top dog :pedomustdie: likes this.
   • Machismo repeated this.
   •  (mint@ryona.agency)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Dec-2023 23:54:57 JST 

     in reply to
     It truly takes the cheapest tricks to convince the twitter nigger cattle they have any resemblance of privacy on a basic pub/sub network. Next thing you'll hear is them thinking that deletes or scopes do anything as well.
   • † top dog :pedomustdie: (dcc@annihilation.social)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Dec-2023 23:55:19 JST † top dog :pedomustdie:

     in reply to
     @mint Both masodont and gelinsation do this, and its fucking hilarious.
      likes this.
   •  (mint@ryona.agency)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Dec-2023 23:56:34 JST 

     in reply to
     Actually, scratch that. Even on twitter you could open a private window and see the posts of anyone who's blocked you. It's always been but a minor inconvenience.
     Machismo repeated this.
   • Machismo (zerglingman@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Dec-2023 23:57:23 JST Machismo

     in reply to
     @mint >deletes
     The amount of fucking people that lose their mind when I tell them I run clients that ignore delete events, or just... Log locally.
     Like what the fuck are these fucking normies doing in these niche spaces, how did they get that far and not understand this most basic truth: The internet never forgets!
      and † top dog :pedomustdie: like this.
   • teknomunk (teknomunk@apogee.polaris-1.work)'s status on Wednesday, 13-Dec-2023 00:02:45 JST teknomunk

     in reply to

     • Machismo
     @Zerglingman @mint
     
     They probably also flip out over screenshots.
     
     :talulah_tired:
      likes this.
     :awoo_tired: shotgun snuggler :clownpiece_smug: repeated this.
   • Machismo (zerglingman@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Wednesday, 13-Dec-2023 00:03:21 JST Machismo

     in reply to

     • teknomunk
     @teknomunk @mint >the app blocks screenshots
     >the app informs the other party when a screenshot is taken
     My brain is full of fuck
     blob
      and :awoo_tired: shotgun snuggler :clownpiece_smug: like this.
   • teknomunk (teknomunk@apogee.polaris-1.work)'s status on Wednesday, 13-Dec-2023 00:05:16 JST teknomunk

     in reply to

     • Machismo
     • teknomunk
     @Zerglingman @mint
     
     > takes photo of screen
     
     Every measure has its countermeasure.
     
     :frieren_smug:
   • Machismo (zerglingman@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Wednesday, 13-Dec-2023 00:05:30 JST Machismo

     in reply to

     • teknomunk
     @teknomunk @mint Modern problems require modern solutions.
     Or just freedom.
   • teknomunk (teknomunk@apogee.polaris-1.work)'s status on Wednesday, 13-Dec-2023 00:07:42 JST teknomunk

     in reply to

     • Machismo
     • teknomunk
     @Zerglingman @mint
     
     Precisely.
     
     The ultimate fix is to leave their control and build your own.
   • :verified_2:防空識別區𝒔𝒐𝒄𝟶 (adiz@soc0.outrnat.nl)'s status on Wednesday, 13-Dec-2023 00:10:24 JST :verified_2:防空識別區𝒔𝒐𝒄𝟶

     in reply to

     @mint@ryona.agency There's also the issue where blocked people can sometimes still see and reply to posts of the person that blocked themUh, yes. That's how it should work. You shouldn't be allowed to dictate behavior to another user, especially another user on a remote instance. If you want to block a user outright and never see/hear from them again, that's good for you---but, that should not prevent that user from accessing or engaging with content.

      likes this.
   • Machismo (zerglingman@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Wednesday, 13-Dec-2023 00:10:37 JST Machismo

     in reply to

     • teknomunk
     @teknomunk @mint We leave for a place we've once called our home
     Until this our fortress, away had been blown
     By forces that banished us to the unknown
     Still we are the strange outsiders, but we're not alone
     
     None shall ever, banish us again!
   •  (mint@ryona.agency)'s status on Wednesday, 13-Dec-2023 00:11:05 JST 

     in reply to

     • Pawlicker
     My boy @PurpCat wrote how majority of Bluesky's supposed security features are implemented client-side and thus could be easily circumvented have anyone actually gave enough fucks about their leprosorium of an SNS.
     https://pleromanonx86.wordpress.com/2023/10/23/bluesky-the-new-containment-site
     Well, it won't hurt to remind that our favorite vegan does the exact same thing to Soapbox. Posts of users that block you are hidden from threads and their profiles. Try to go to random instance running it and click on "posts & replies", with 99% chance you'd get redirected to a login page with no apparent reason other than cargo cult. The fact it's toggleable doesn't change anything as no one bothers changing that.
     † top dog :pedomustdie: likes this.
   • Caek Islove 🍰 ❤️ (caekislove@gleasonator.com)'s status on Wednesday, 13-Dec-2023 00:12:08 JST Caek Islove 🍰 ❤️

     in reply to
     @mint Even Mute Account hasn't worked reliably for months. It's total anarchy up in this joint!! 😂
      likes this.
   • Caek Islove 🍰 ❤️ (caekislove@gleasonator.com)'s status on Wednesday, 13-Dec-2023 00:25:33 JST Caek Islove 🍰 ❤️

     in reply to
     @mint I don't think that works anymore now that they paywalled the site.
      likes this.
   •  (mint@ryona.agency)'s status on Wednesday, 13-Dec-2023 00:26:30 JST 

     in reply to

     • Caek Islove 🍰 ❤️
     @caekislove Maybe. Nitter still works and I haven't opened an actual site in years.
   • Pawlicker (purpcat@clubcyberia.co)'s status on Wednesday, 13-Dec-2023 00:26:53 JST Pawlicker

     in reply to
     @mint Gleason is ripping off the worst aspects of Twitter too because he thinks what the Fedi is lacking is that it's not twitter.
     
     It's more polished than bluesky is right now but what keeps people from truly using it is the extreme login wall and lack of users.
      likes this.
   • Pawlicker (purpcat@clubcyberia.co)'s status on Wednesday, 13-Dec-2023 00:39:18 JST Pawlicker

     in reply to
     @mint I should add on privacy through obscurity with bsky.
     
     So basically as long as you're not a wigger and don't get your account banned too easily you can make new accounts very easily. See; Bsky just hands out invites like halloween candy now. And this guy (who had waged gayops against me in the past, lurks Telegram groups of people he hates, was involved with Hotwheels during his betrayal arc) was blocking me. So I wondered what he was saying about me online or if he was too much of a coward to (I found out his job quit paying him, so much for college LOL).
     
     All I had to do was make a new account with a generic username, no PFP, and never post anything. Now not only did I bypass the block, but as I found out I was getting double invites (like double XP in CoD). Now I have at least 7 invites now I can hand out.
     
     But it doesn't matter. For being open and decentralized, it is one of the most jannied up websites online and I hate everything it represents, I hate the userbase there, and I hope it continues to slowly burn.
      likes this.