Conversation

Notices

1. Russell James (russ@pieville.net)'s status on Monday, 19-Dec-2022 21:18:11 JST Russell James

   "Feminism" is not about "equality".

   The purpose of feminism is to separate White women from White men in an effort to get them to think, act, and (perhaps most importantly) vote in a manner conducive to advancing Jewish interests.

   https://www.stormfront.org/forum/blogs/u151910-e4666/

   • Charliebrownau (charliebrownau@pieville.net)'s status on Monday, 19-Dec-2022 21:18:09 JST Charliebrownau

     in reply to

     @russ

     State Mandated 'equality'

     - Anti Nation
     - Anti Ethnic Nationalism
     - Anti Working Class
     - Anti Straight Male

     Affirmative Action
     Feminism
     Multi racialism
     Diversity
     Open Borders
     Anti Self Defense
     Anti Free Speech

     Its all Jewish
     its all denial of biological traits
     Its all a racial weapon to de populate us by ((( THEM )))

     Every aspect about Everything is Jewish

     Male vs Female
     White vs non white
     straight vs mentally
     abled vs disabled in workforce
     all competing for limited jobs

   • 寮 (ryo@social.076.moe)'s status on Tuesday, 20-Dec-2022 01:08:24 JST 寮

     in reply to

     • Charliebrownau
     What the feminazi's want is women supremacy.
   • Charliebrownau (charliebrownau@pieville.net)'s status on Tuesday, 20-Dec-2022 05:57:25 JST Charliebrownau

     in reply to

     • 寮

     @ryo No

     Its always been a Jewish weapon agianst whitey and goyim

   • 寮 (ryo@social.076.moe)'s status on Tuesday, 20-Dec-2022 12:05:57 JST 寮

     in reply to

     • Charliebrownau
     It's a parody on "white supremacy" brah, don't take my play on words too seriously.
   • Terminal Autism (terminalautism@social.076.moe)'s status on Tuesday, 20-Dec-2022 12:46:27 JST Terminal Autism

     in reply to

     • 寮
     The way that I see it, there aren't many people out there that hate women more than most "feminists" do. They hate femininity with passion and want to absolutely destroy it. They want women to be fat, ugly and mean corporate wage slaves.
     
     Of course, current feminists. I can see the point of being a feminist in the past, because look at how fucking shitty most men are and imagine having to rely on them for everything. Hell, in lower class families in many places and times in history, it was perfectly normal for families to sell daughters into slavery or prostitution, and they basically had no other choice. I can even see the point of hating men because I relate to that, because I hate men too, because they're shit, and I hate women too, because they're shit too. People that I like are a small minority, in this species. Women are average, so there are fewer examples of exceptions (the best and worst people are almost all men). I can't think of a single one that I actually know, because in places with people that are not retard monkeys, there are always exactly zero women.
     
     Also worth mentioning, feminism was probably a political psyop, but still, it was one that took advantage of a legitimate problem. Women should have the option to be self-sufficient even if it's not the primary option and even if they objectively fucking suck at it. And it wouldn't be a primary option in a perfect world, but this is not a perfect world.
     
     Another factor here is that women became the ultimate consoomers, so they are even better wage slaves than men. They are shaped by their environment more so than men, and the brainwashing industry (schools, media, advertisement) and corporate hive mind really like that.
     寮 likes this.
   • scroll (scroll@social.076.moe)'s status on Tuesday, 20-Dec-2022 20:52:22 JST scroll

     in reply to

     • Terminal Autism
     > They want women to be fat, ugly and mean corporate wage slaves.
     
     This is a trad con falsehood you're spreading. Feminists complain about the glass ceiling so that women can boss around slaves of their own, even though women avoid career risk-taking.
     
     > I can see the point of being a feminist in the past
     
     Maybe you also see the point of Nazism in the past as well? I'm not meaning to be rude yet, I'm just complaining that people like you give a pussy-pass to a hate movement.
     
     > it was perfectly normal for families to sell daughters into slavery or prostitution
     
     This is a feminist falsehood.
     
     > I hate men
     
     This seems to be the only thing men generally agree on (normies just hide it better). Misanthropes always hate men more than they hate women.
     
     > feminism was probably a political psyop
     
     Feminism is a grassroots hate movement, because women naturally prefer the company of other women and men soon learn to avoid other men. Thus it is easy for women to organize to push for their own gender interests.
     
     > legitimate problem
     
     This is a typical "Pendulum swung too far" fallacy common in anti-feminist circles.
     
     > Women should have the option to be self-sufficient
     
     You can be self-sufficient if you live by yourself in the woods. No one restricted women from taking that option. Women argued that men have to take up burdens so women can get by doing less. This is not a position a self-sufficient person takes in a dialogue and no one would tolerate from a man. People point at the door when a man demands easier work than was agreed on.
     
     > [Self-sufficiency] is not the primary option
     
     That's why no one who tells you to go live in the woods ever takes that option. Being a second, and even a third class citizen is better than being all by yourself.
     寮 likes this.
   • 寮 (ryo@social.076.moe)'s status on Tuesday, 20-Dec-2022 23:03:25 JST 寮

     in reply to

     • scroll
     I've seen some wokie at some Masto instance with the same icon and name before, so I thought you were here for pushing their agenda, but reading the content of this post, I see that's not the case, so thank goodness!
     
     Although I would say that the first 2 waves were grassroots movements, and from the 3rd wave onwards it became a political divide and conquer scheme.
     Just compare, the first 2 were all about granting women more rights, whether good or bad, I just mean objectively.
     The 3rd and 4th (if we're in the 4th already that is) is all like "kill all men" while in the same breath being all like "men must fund my existance because I refuse to support myself".
     
     I personally have a fair use policy with my gf, and we're never going to marry.
     I give her a bit of my income, and in return she cleans my house.
     I teach her what she wants to know about computers, and in return I get to drill that hole between her legs.
     And so on.
   • scroll (scroll@social.076.moe)'s status on Wednesday, 18-Jan-2023 16:49:22 JST scroll

     in reply to

     • 寮
     For that to be a divide and conquer scheme, there should be opponents on both side of the fence. As we see, women are unanimously pro-women and men are unanimously pro-women. There are minor disagreements between some fringe groups of radical feminists, but the institutionalized version enjoys bipartisan support.