Conversation

Notices

1. CEO of Monoeye Dating (ceo_of_monoeye_dating@bae.st)'s status on Friday, 24-Nov-2023 12:54:46 JST CEO of Monoeye Dating

   in reply to

   • Terry
   • 🐘🐘 Humpleupagus 🐘🐘
   • CrustyB
   @Humpleupagus @Terry @CrustyB This is wrong, but it is wrong in all of the ways I want a lawyer to be wrong.
   
   The underlying assumption is that the rule of law applies.
   
   We are not making that assumption.
   • Machismo likes this.
   • 🐘🐘 Humpleupagus 🐘🐘 (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Friday, 24-Nov-2023 12:54:47 JST 🐘🐘 Humpleupagus 🐘🐘

     in reply to

     • Terry
     • CrustyB
     I hope they try it and some kike at the uspto approves it, so they can sue and get laughed out of court and sanctioned. The fact they're admitting that they're doing it to interfere with 1A rights will be exhibit no. 1 in a rule 11 motion for sanctions.
   • 🐘🐘 Humpleupagus 🐘🐘 (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Friday, 24-Nov-2023 12:54:48 JST 🐘🐘 Humpleupagus 🐘🐘

     in reply to

     • Terry
     It can't be trademarked. 😩
   • CrustyB (crustyb@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Friday, 24-Nov-2023 12:54:48 JST CrustyB

     in reply to

     • Terry
     • 🐘🐘 Humpleupagus 🐘🐘
     They can trademark it. Why? BECAUSE 6,000,000 DEAD JEWS AND FOUR THOUSAND YEARS OF SUFFERING, THAT'S WHY!
   • Terry (terry@bae.st)'s status on Friday, 24-Nov-2023 12:54:49 JST Terry
     In an attempt to get you to stop saying it, jews are trying to trademark "from the river to the sea."
     Screenshot_20231123_143331_Brave.jpg