Conversation

Notices

1. Jeff Cliff (jeffcliff@shitposter.club)'s status on Wednesday, 25-Oct-2023 10:25:33 JST Jeff Cliff

   • Bender Molari :nv: :nofatpeople:
   • thadius
   • nosat
   • Ovpod
   • guy savelli
   • meso
   • dicey
   > Lowen and coauthors [37] tested the impact of ambient temperature and relative humidity (RH) on the efficiency of viral spread between hosts
   
   in other words
   *they measured the efficiency of viral spread* ie the infectiousness
   
   it is *obvious* to the authors that viruses exist because it's causing infection, and it's testing as such. What's *not* obvious is how much infectiveness there is, which is what you were questioning upthread. That's what they measured.
   
   Now you're moving the goalposts back to PCR.
   • nosat (nosat@liberdon.com)'s status on Wednesday, 25-Oct-2023 10:31:33 JST nosat

     in reply to

     • Bender Molari :nv: :nofatpeople:
     • thadius
     • Ovpod
     • guy savelli
     • meso
     • dicey

     @jeffcliff @protimetheft @conspiracy @Evil_Bender @thadius @Ovpod @dicey @meso

     again it does not prove viruses exist and are infectious

     you are skipping the fundamental premise and jumping to how infectious are they when there is zero science showing they are infectious

     stop lying you clown, how are you not yet embarrassed, everyone here can see you are a liar or a moron